Skip to content

Decision

2025 Commission report on Kosovo

Effect
Adopted
Result
412 for · 174 against · 58 abstained roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 14:30–14:31
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Committee report by Riho Terras
Topics
Foreign affairs Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
5 votes · 4 roll calls · 3 amendments
Requested by
Patriots (1 roll call) · ESN (1 roll call)
Final vote
193892
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 412 for, 174 against, 58 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 amendments (3 rejected) and 1 part of the text voted on separately (1 rejected).

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by The Left, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 11Against 23Abst. 7No vote 4 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 100Against 1Abst. 17No vote 17 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
RenewFor 62Against 0Abst. 6No vote 10 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
EPPFor 130Against 25Abst. 9No vote 21 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.69
ECRFor 57Against 17Abst. 2No vote 6 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.63
PatriotsFor 1Against 64Abst. 12No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
ESNFor 1Against 22Abst. 3No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.77
No groupFor 4Against 22Abst. 2No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 94

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria126020.50
Belgium164110.64
Bulgaria140210.81
Cyprus0600—
Czechia114510.33
Germany63201120.63
Denmark132000.80
Estonia6001—
Spain14311230.32
Finland130021.00
France2844450.37
Greece061140.47
Croatia110011.00
Hungary71760.20
Ireland100220.75
Italy5315170.65
Lithuania8012—
Luxembourg6000—
Latvia8100—
Malta5001—
Netherlands209020.53
Poland445040.85
Portugal163020.76
Romania956130.17
Sweden183000.79
Slovenia7002—
Slovakia09510.46

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 644 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Javi LÓPEZ SpainS&DSpeeches117 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded

All votes on this decision, 5

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 3 to paragraph 2 A10-0166/2026 – Riho Terras – § 2 – Am 3 Roll call134 for, 488 against, 18 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
2Amendment 4 to paragraph 6 A10-0166/2026 – Riho Terras – § 6 – Am 4 Roll call126 for, 443 against, 43 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
3Separate vote on paragraph 52 Counted272 for, 300 against, 69 abstained Rejected
4Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 63 A10-0166/2026 – Riho Terras – After § 63 – Am 2 Roll call252 for, 305 against, 89 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
5Final vote — text as a whole A10-0166/2026 – Riho Terras – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call412 for, 174 against, 58 abstained Adopted
Show the other 4 votesShow the other 0 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendment 4 to paragraph 6 A10-0166/2026 – Riho Terras – § 6 – Am 4 Roll call126 for, 443 against, 43 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
3Separate vote on paragraph 52 Counted272 for, 300 against, 69 abstained Rejected
4Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 63 A10-0166/2026 – Riho Terras – After § 63 – Am 2 Roll call252 for, 305 against, 89 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
5Final vote — text as a whole A10-0166/2026 – Riho Terras – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call412 for, 174 against, 58 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by Patriots, ESN.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0166

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted its resolution on the 2025 Commission report on Kosovo, setting out its political assessment of the country's progress and challenges.

The text commends Kosovo's commitment to EU accession and stresses that its future lies in the EU, while noting that 2025 was a 'lost year' due to political stalemate.

Parliament calls for renewed vigour in the Pristina-Belgrade dialogue and highlights the negative impact of EU punitive measures on Kosovo's society.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The report assesses Kosovo's progress towards EU accession, covering political developments, rule of law, human rights, and socio-economic reforms. It commends Kosovo's commitment but notes challenges and calls for reforms.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2252(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament adopted the text on 17 June 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 18 December 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 3 June 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 10 June 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 17 June 2026 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: AFET · Author: Riho TERRAS (EPP)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 24 connections: Running issue: Pristina-Belgrade dialogue · Running issue: EU enlargement · Other decisions of the part-session on AFET dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: Pristina-Belgrade dialogue

Running issue: EU enlargement

Other decisions of the part-session on AFET dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on AFET dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “2025 Commission report on Kosovo”. Decision, 17 June 2026. votingId 193892, document A-10-2026-0166, reference 2025/2252(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-17/16 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-06-17-16,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{2025 Commission report on Kosovo}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-17/16}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-17/16},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 193892, document A-10-2026-0166, reference 2025/2252(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}