Analysis
Members compared
All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted
How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?
Members compared
Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.
- Manfred WEBER EPP · DE Remove
- Manon AUBRY The Left · FR Remove
The members, 2
Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.
- Manfred WEBER EPP · Germany
- Manon AUBRY The Left · France
Agreement, pair by pair, 1
Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.
| Members | Agreement | Same position | Shared votes | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manfred WEBER and Manon AUBRY | 52.2 % | 2 330 | 4 465 | 50.9 % |
Where they differed, 2 135
Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.
| Vote | Manfred WEBER | Manon AUBRY |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026 Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 12 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee | Against | For |
| 15 Sept 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against |
| 15 Sept 2026 Recital BT — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against |
| 15 Sept 2026 Amendment 11, adding text after citation 70 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | Against | For |
| 15 Sept 2026 Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 110 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | Against | For |
| 15 Sept 2026 Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 110 — part 1 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | Against | For |
| 15 Sept 2026 Paragraph 101 — part 5 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Abstained |
| 15 Sept 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 82 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Abstained |
| 15 Sept 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 47 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Abstained |
| 15 Sept 2026 Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 44 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | Against | For |
| 15 Sept 2026 Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 42 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | Against | For |
| 15 Sept 2026 Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 32 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | Against | For |
| 15 Sept 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 30 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Abstained |
| 15 Sept 2026 Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 24 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | Against | For |
| 15 Sept 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 17 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against |
| 15 Sept 2026 Paragraph 15 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Abstained |
| 15 Sept 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 12 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Abstained |
| 15 Sept 2026 Paragraph 9 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against |
| 15 Sept 2026 Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 6 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | Against | For |
| 15 Sept 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 4 Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure | For | Against |
| 15 Sept 2026 Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure | Against | Abstained |
| 15 Sept 2026 Final vote on the provisional agreement Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectors | For | Abstained |
| 15 Sept 2026 Final vote Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowances | For | Abstained |
| 15 Sept 2026 Amendment 6, adding text after Article 1; Decision (EU) 2015/1814 Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowances | Against | For |
| 15 Sept 2026 Amendments 89 + 105 + 108 (voted as one) to Article 1 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures | For | Against |
| 15 Sept 2026 Amendment 7 — part 4 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures | For | Against |
| 15 Sept 2026 Amendment 7 — part 2 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures | For | Against |
| 15 Sept 2026 Amendment 7 — part 1 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures | For | Against |
| 14 Sept 2026 Monday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — ECB Monday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – ECB | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Amendment 13 to recital D Joint communication on humanitarian aid | Abstained | Against |
| 9 Jul 2026 Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 Joint communication on humanitarian aid | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 4 Joint communication on humanitarian aid | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 Joint communication on humanitarian aid | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Feasibility of a 28th tax regime and its potential to support EU competitiveness | For | Against |
| 9 Jul 2026 Amendment 3 to recital B The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Amendment 5 to paragraph 6 The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan | For | Against |
| 9 Jul 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre | For | Abstained |
| 9 Jul 2026 Amendment 1, adding text after recital D The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Paragraph 7 — part 2 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Paragraph 5 — part 4 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Paragraph 5 — part 2 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Proposal to reject the text Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Amendment 3 to recital 11 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Amendment 29 to Article 11 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive | Against | For |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-25
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-25}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-25},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}