Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Members compared

All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted

How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes620All roll calls5 928
Abstentions Count as a positionIgnore (for and against only) ⓘ

Members compared

Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.

The members, 2

Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.

Agreement, pair by pair, 1

Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.

Agreement: same position ÷ shared votes (for, against and abstained); a count below 50 shared votes. Shared votes: votes where both recorded a position. Baseline: the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the shared votes — groups at the date; when one changed group, each combination weighted by the votes shared in it.
MembersAgreementSame positionShared votesBaseline
Manfred WEBER and Manon AUBRY52.2 %2 3304 46550.9 %

Where they differed, 2 135

Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.

Each member’s recorded position: For, Against, Abstained, No vote recorded, or Not in office on that day.
VoteManfred WEBERManon AUBRY
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstFor
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 13 to recital C — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersForAbstained
17 Sept 2026 Paragraph 5 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersForAgainst
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersForAbstained
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersForAgainst
17 Sept 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainst
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 1, adding text after recital G Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstFor
17 Sept 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 22 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainst
17 Sept 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 20 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainst
17 Sept 2026 Paragraph 13 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstFor
17 Sept 2026 Paragraph 13 — part 1 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainst
17 Sept 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 12 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainst
17 Sept 2026 Paragraph 5 — part 4 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainst
17 Sept 2026 Paragraph 5 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainst
17 Sept 2026 Paragraph 5 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainst
17 Sept 2026 Paragraph 4 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAbstained
17 Sept 2026 Paragraph 4 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAbstained
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 5 to paragraph 4 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstFor
17 Sept 2026 Paragraph 2 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainst
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 4 to paragraph 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstFor
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstFor
17 Sept 2026 Paragraph 1 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainst
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstFor
17 Sept 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleForAgainst
17 Sept 2026 Paragraph 63 — part 3 Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleForAgainst
17 Sept 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroForAgainst
16 Sept 2026 Paragraph 62 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstFor
16 Sept 2026 Paragraph 48 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstFor
16 Sept 2026 Paragraph 43 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstFor
16 Sept 2026 Paragraph 24 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstFor
16 Sept 2026 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 19 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedAgainst
16 Sept 2026 Paragraph 18 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstFor
16 Sept 2026 Paragraph 16 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstFor
16 Sept 2026 Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedAgainst
16 Sept 2026 Paragraph 6 — part 5 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstFor
16 Sept 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureForAgainst
16 Sept 2026 Final vote Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation 2028-2034ForAbstained
16 Sept 2026 Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Switzerland Agreement on the transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crimeForAgainst
16 Sept 2026 Final vote on the provisional agreement Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V)ForAgainst
16 Sept 2026 Proposal to reject the text Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V)AgainstFor
16 Sept 2026 Final vote on the provisional agreement Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V)ForAgainst
16 Sept 2026 Proposal to reject the text Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V)AgainstFor
16 Sept 2026 Final vote on the provisional agreement Simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and simplification of security and defence procurement (Omnibus V)ForAgainst
15 Sept 2026 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Global role of the euroForAbstained
15 Sept 2026 Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 49 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027AgainstAbstained
15 Sept 2026 Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 40 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027AgainstFor
15 Sept 2026 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 36 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027AgainstFor
15 Sept 2026 Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 36 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027AgainstFor
15 Sept 2026 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 35 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027AgainstFor
15 Sept 2026 Amendment 3 to paragraph 55 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeForAgainst

Show all 50 votes on this page

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-25
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}