Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Anouk VAN BRUG
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Anouk VAN BRUG only. Show every member
Anouk VAN BRUG’s votes against the line, 33
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector | Against | For | Renew |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee | Against | For | Renew |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure | Against | For | Renew |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Draft amending budget No 1/2026: entering the surplus of the financial year 2025 | Against | For | Renew |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Final vote on the provisional agreement Coordination of social security systems | Against | For | Renew |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peace | Against | For | Renew |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Final vote General arrangements for excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products | For | Against | Renew |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Final vote on the provisional agreement Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | Abstained | For | Renew |
| 21 May 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap | Against | For | Renew |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Supporting democratic resilience in Armenia | Against | For | Renew |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Women’s entrepreneurship in rural and island areas and outermost regions | Abstained | For | Renew |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases? | Abstained | For | Renew |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European Parliament | Abstained | For | Renew |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquaculture | Against | For | Renew |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Final vote on the provisional agreement European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: workers affected by imminent job displacement | Against | For | Renew |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III | Abstained | For | Renew |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | Against | For | Renew |
| 12 Mar 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024 | For | Against | Renew |
| 11 Mar 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026 | Against | For | Renew |
| 11 Mar 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors | Abstained | For | Renew |
| 10 Mar 2026 | Final vote on the provisional agreement Establishing an EU talent pool | Against | For | Renew |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy | Abstained | For | Renew |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies | Against | For | Renew |
| 9 Jul 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum | Abstained | For | Renew |
| 9 Jul 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole Draft amending budget No 1/2025: entering the surplus of the financial year 2024 | Abstained | For | Renew |
| 7 May 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world | Abstained | For | Renew |
| 6 May 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2024/003 BE/Van Hool – Belgium | Against | For | Renew |
| 3 Apr 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2026 – Section I – European Parliament | Abstained | For | Renew |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025 | Against | For | Renew |
| 11 Mar 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole European Social Fund Plus post-2027 | Against | For | Renew |
| 27 Nov 2024 | Joint text Final vote 2025 budgetary procedure: Joint text | Abstained | For | Renew |
| 18 Sept 2024 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Maximum residue levels for cyproconazole | Against | For | Renew |
| 18 Sept 2024 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Maximum residue levels for carbendazim and thiophanate-methyl | Against | For | Renew |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 100 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anouk VAN BRUG , Renew · Netherlands | 7.9 % | 416 | 21 | 12 | 0 | 29 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 620 votes considered (final votes matching the filters; scope).
- 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 100 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=257438&scope=final&to=2026-09-25
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Anouk VAN BRUG”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=257438&scope=final&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Anouk VAN BRUG}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=257438&scope=final&to=2026-09-25}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=257438&scope=final&to=2026-09-25},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}