Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
All roll calls · 26 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Wouter BEKE
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Wouter BEKE only. Show every member
Wouter BEKE’s votes against the line, 78
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Against | For | EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Against | For | EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 48 to paragraph 8 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Against | For | EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Against | For | EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Against | For | EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Against | EPP |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 48 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | For | Against | EPP |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 45 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | Against | For | EPP |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 43 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | Abstained | Against | EPP |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 19 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | Against | Abstained | EPP |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 12 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee | For | Against | EPP |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 10 Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure | Against | For | EPP |
| 9 Jul 2026 | Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 4, adding text after recital I The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality | For | Against | EPP |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 14 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 2, adding text after recital M — part 1 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Against | EPP |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Paragraph 24 — part 2 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets | Against | For | EPP |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Amendment 4 to paragraph 33 A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sector | Abstained | Against | EPP |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 25 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland | For | Against | EPP |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 4 Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba | For | Against | EPP |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 63 2025 Commission report on Kosovo | Against | For | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Final vote General arrangements for excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products | Against | For | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 4 to Article 1, paragraph 1, after point 1; Directive (EU) 2020/262 General arrangements for excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Final vote Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | Against | For | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 93 to recital 18 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 92 to recital 15 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 91, adding text after Recital 4 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 90, adding text after Recital 3 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 89 to recital 3 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendments 67 + 70 (voted as one) to Article 20 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | Against | For | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendments 60 + 61 (voted as one) to Article 16 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | Against | For | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 96 to Article 12, after paragraph 4 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 95 to Article 12, paragraph 4 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | For | Against | EPP |
| 21 May 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 64 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap | Abstained | Against | EPP |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 41, adding text after recital P Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | For | Against | EPP |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendments 27 + 39 (voted as one) to paragraph 1, after point ag Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | Against | For | EPP |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendments 25 + 38 (voted as one) to paragraph 1, after point af Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | Against | For | EPP |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Amendment 1 to paragraph 20 Banking Union – annual report 2025 | For | Against | EPP |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 17 — part 2 Banking Union – annual report 2025 | For | Against | EPP |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 4 — part 3 Banking Union – annual report 2025 | For | Against | EPP |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 4 — part 2 Banking Union – annual report 2025 | For | Against | EPP |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 27 — part 2 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European Parliament | For | Against | EPP |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 117 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report | Abstained | Against | EPP |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 1 to paragraph 13 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report | Against | For | EPP |
Show all 78 votes
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Apr 2026 | Recital BB — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | For | Against | EPP |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Recital AP — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | For | Against | EPP |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Recital W — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | Against | For | EPP |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Separate vote on citation 28 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | For | Against | EPP |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 101 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | For | Against | EPP |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 70 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | Abstained | Against | EPP |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 64 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | For | Against | EPP |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 56 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | For | Against | EPP |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 48 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | For | Against | EPP |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendments 114 + 100 (voted as one), adding text after recital 22 Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products | For | Against | EPP |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 117 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a, point i Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products | For | Against | EPP |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 116 to Article 2, before paragraph 1 Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products | For | Against | EPP |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 63 Discharge 2024: European Public Prosecutor’s Office | For | Abstained | EPP |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 22 to paragraph 138 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament | For | Against | EPP |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 15 to paragraph 44 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament | For | Against | EPP |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024 | Against | For | EPP |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendments 1 + 25 (voted as one), adding text after citation 21 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024 | For | Against | EPP |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 21 to paragraph 71 — part 2 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024 | For | Against | EPP |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 18 to paragraph 53 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024 | For | Against | EPP |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 32 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024 | For | Against | EPP |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 5 to paragraph 25 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024 | For | Against | EPP |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Recital AP — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU | Against | For | EPP |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 6 to paragraph 21 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU | For | Against | EPP |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 19 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU | For | Against | EPP |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 5 to paragraph 16 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU | For | Against | EPP |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Amendment 31 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) | Against | For | EPP |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Amendment 90 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) | For | Against | EPP |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation) | Abstained | For | EPP |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wouter BEKE , EPP · Belgium | 4.8 % | 1 640 | 65 | 11 | 2 | 54 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 1 752 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 26 Sept 2026, 03:32 UTC (data stamp 579b2832c723, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-26&mep=256887&to=2026-09-26
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 26 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 26 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Wouter BEKE”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-26&mep=256887&to=2026-09-26 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-26,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 26 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Wouter BEKE}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-26&mep=256887&to=2026-09-26}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-26&mep=256887&to=2026-09-26},
urldate = {2026-09-26},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}