Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Ivaylo VALCHEV

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
25 Mar 2026 – today
Votes Final votes185All roll calls1 755
Order Highest rate firstBy name

Showing Ivaylo VALCHEV only. Show every member

Ivaylo VALCHEV’s votes against the line, 55

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 85 — part 2 Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleAbstainedAgainstECR
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 85 — part 1 Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleAbstainedAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on citation 19 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on citation 9 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital AB Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital AA Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital Z Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 63 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 44 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 43 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 43 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 41 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 8 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 8 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 8 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAbstainedECR
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 50 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAbstainedAgainstECR
9 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 — part 2 Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacreAgainstForECR
8 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on UkraineAbstainedForECR
7 Jul 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningAbstainedForECR
18 Jun 2026Recital G — part 2 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandAgainstForECR
17 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on North MacedoniaForAbstainedECR
17 Jun 2026Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 43 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeAbstainedAgainstECR
17 Jun 2026Separate vote on paragraph 42 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeAbstainedForECR
21 May 2026Separate vote on recital AC Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAbstainedAgainstECR
21 May 2026Recital R — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAbstainedAgainstECR
21 May 2026Recital R — part 1 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAbstainedAgainstECR
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 79 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAbstainedAgainstECR
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 64 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAbstainedAgainstECR
21 May 2026Paragraph 49 — part 1 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapForAgainstECR
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 43 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAbstainedAgainstECR
20 May 2026Separate vote on citation 25 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAbstainedAgainstECR
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point al — part 5 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainstECR
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point al — part 3 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainstECR
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point al — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainstECR
20 May 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 1, after point l Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedForECR
20 May 2026Amendment 47 to paragraph 1, after point i Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 117 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAbstainedAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on recital AO Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on recital AL Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Amendment 10, adding text after recital G Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedForECR
29 Apr 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 86 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 71 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 70 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 70 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Amendment 56, adding text after paragraph 59 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AgainstForECR
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 138 — part 1 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAbstainedAgainstECR
28 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAbstainedAgainstECR
28 Apr 2026Recital AJ — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAbstainedAgainstECR
28 Apr 2026Recital AC — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAbstainedAgainstECR
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 28 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAbstainedAgainstECR
Show all 55 votes
Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 19 — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUForAgainstECR
28 Apr 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 16 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAbstainedAgainstECR
28 Apr 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 7 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUForAgainstECR
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 54 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034AbstainedAgainstECR
28 Apr 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 36 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034AbstainedAgainstECR

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Ivaylo VALCHEV , ECR · Bulgaria 3.8 %1 44994420

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257258&to=2026-09-26
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Ivaylo VALCHEV”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257258&to=2026-09-26 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-26,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Ivaylo VALCHEV}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257258&to=2026-09-26}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257258&to=2026-09-26},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}