Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Adrian-George AXINIA

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
25 Mar 2026 – today
Votes Final votes185All roll calls1 755
Order Highest rate firstBy name

Showing Adrian-George AXINIA only. Show every member

Adrian-George AXINIA’s votes against the line, 82

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on citation 9 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 44 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 18 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 8 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
15 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027ForAbstainedECR
15 Sept 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 54 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAbstainedForECR
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 50 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldForAgainstECR
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 32 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAgainstAbstainedECR
15 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditureForAbstainedECR
9 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 — part 2 Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacreAgainstForECR
9 Jul 2026Amendment 12 to Article 2, after point 4 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAgainstForECR
9 Jul 2026Proposal to reject the text Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAgainstForECR
8 Jul 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital I The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityForAgainstECR
8 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on UkraineAbstainedForECR
8 Jul 2026Separate vote on paragraph 14 2025 Commission report on UkraineAgainstForECR
8 Jul 2026Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 3 2025 Commission report on UkraineForAgainstECR
8 Jul 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 3 2025 Commission report on UkraineForAgainstECR
8 Jul 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 45 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstECR
7 Jul 2026Separate vote on paragraph 35 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningForAgainstECR
7 Jul 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningAbstainedForECR
7 Jul 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 50 Competition policy – annual report 2025AbstainedForECR
7 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 12 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025AgainstForECR
7 Jul 2026Request for urgent procedure Final vote Temporary derogation from certain provisions of the ePrivacy Directive to combat online child sexual abuseForAgainstECR
17 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on KosovoAbstainedForECR
17 Jun 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 2 2025 Commission report on KosovoForAgainstECR
17 Jun 2026Paragraph 71 — part 2 2025 Commission report on North MacedoniaAgainstForECR
17 Jun 2026Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 43 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeAbstainedAgainstECR
17 Jun 2026Separate vote on paragraph 42 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeAbstainedForECR
21 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapForAbstainedECR
21 May 2026Recital R — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapForAgainstECR
21 May 2026Recital R — part 1 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapForAgainstECR
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 79 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapForAgainstECR
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 43 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAbstainedAgainstECR
21 May 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Rights, support and protection of victims of crimeForAbstainedECR
20 May 2026Separate vote on citation 25 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAbstainedAgainstECR
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point al — part 5 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedAgainstECR
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point al — part 3 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedAgainstECR
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point al — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedAgainstECR
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point n — part 3 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainstECR
20 May 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 1, after point l Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedForECR
20 May 2026Amendment 47 to paragraph 1, after point i Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedAgainstECR
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identitiesAbstainedForECR
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on recital AO Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on recital AL Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Amendment 10, adding text after recital G Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedForECR
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on citation 45 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on citation 28 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on citation 17 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 70 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 60 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstECR
Show all 82 votes
Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 56 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 10 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAbstainedECR
29 Apr 2026Amendments 114 + 100 (voted as one), adding text after recital 22 Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsForAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Amendment 93 to recital 22 Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsForAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Amendment 92, adding text after recital 15 Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsForAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Amendment 91, adding text after recital 15 Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsForAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Amendment 101 to Article 2, paragraph 1, after point 2 Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsAbstainedAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Amendment 97 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsForAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Amendment 117 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a, point i Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsForAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Amendment 116 to Article 2, before paragraph 1 Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsForAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentForAbstainedECR
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 138 — part 1 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAbstainedAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Amendment 46 to paragraph 80 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentForAgainstECR
29 Apr 2026Amendment 32 to paragraph 12 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentForAbstainedECR
29 Apr 2026Amendment 31 to paragraph 11 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentForAbstainedECR
28 Apr 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 35 The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquacultureForAgainstECR
28 Apr 2026Amendment 29 to paragraph 76 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024ForAgainstECR
28 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAbstainedAgainstECR
28 Apr 2026Amendment 139, adding text after Recital 27 Generalised scheme of tariff preferencesAgainstForECR
28 Apr 2026Amendment 63 to paragraph 46 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIForAgainstECR
28 Apr 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 24 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIForAbstainedECR
28 Apr 2026Amendment 2, adding text after Recital P Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAbstainedECR
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 89 — part 2 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034AgainstForECR
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 54 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034AbstainedAgainstECR
28 Apr 2026Amendment 21 to paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAgainstECR
28 Apr 2026Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 38 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAgainstECR
28 Apr 2026Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 37 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAgainstECR
28 Apr 2026Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 36 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAbstainedECR
28 Apr 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 36 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034AbstainedAgainstECR
28 Apr 2026Amendment 87, adding text after paragraph 21 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAbstainedECR
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 13 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034AbstainedAgainstECR
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 4 — part 2 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034AgainstForECR

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Adrian-George AXINIA , ECR · Romania 5.5 %1 47839301363

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 26 Sept 2026, 03:32 UTC (data stamp 579b2832c723, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257117&scope=all&to=2026-09-26
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Adrian-George AXINIA”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257117&scope=all&to=2026-09-26 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-26,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Adrian-George AXINIA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257117&scope=all&to=2026-09-26}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257117&scope=all&to=2026-09-26},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}