Skip to content

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Gabriela FIREA

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
25 Mar 2026 – today

Showing Gabriela FIREA only. Show every member

Gabriela FIREA’s votes against the line, 60

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
8 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize DP202216 x NK603 x DAS-40278-9 and its sub-combinations DP 202216 x NK603, DP202216 x DAS-40278-9AgainstForS&D
8 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize NK603 × T25AgainstForS&D
8 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified soybean MON 87705AgainstForS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital I The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAbstainedForS&D
8 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targetsForAgainstS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 12 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025ForAgainstS&D
18 Jun 2026Recital B — part 2 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandForAgainstS&D
18 Jun 2026Recital B — part 1 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedAgainstS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 14, adding text after recital F Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 13, adding text after recital A Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 23 to paragraph 5 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedAgainstS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 4 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 4 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 4 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 4 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 4 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedAgainstS&D
18 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicinesForAgainstS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 6 — part 3 Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicinesForAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on KosovoAbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 63 2025 Commission report on KosovoAbstainedAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 6 2025 Commission report on KosovoAbstainedAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 2 2025 Commission report on KosovoAbstainedAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 4 to Article 1, paragraph 1, after point 1; Directive (EU) 2020/262 General arrangements for excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related productsAbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Final vote Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)ForAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 93 to recital 18 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)AbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 92 to recital 15 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)AbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 91, adding text after Recital 4 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)AbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 90, adding text after Recital 3 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)AbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 89 to recital 3 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)AbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendments 67 + 70 (voted as one) to Article 20 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)AbstainedAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendments 60 + 61 (voted as one) to Article 16 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)AbstainedAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 96 to Article 12, after paragraph 4 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)AbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 95 to Article 12, paragraph 4 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)AbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 94 to Article 12, after paragraph 3 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)AbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation)AbstainedAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Proposal to vote on amendments Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation)AbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 1 to recital 34 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feedAgainstForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 9 to Article 27, paragraph 1, point c Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feedAbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 8 to Article 9, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2, after point d Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feedAbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 6 to Article 6, paragraph 3, after point d Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feedAbstainedForS&D
16 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesAbstainedForS&D
16 Jun 2026Amendment 8 to recital AJ Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesAbstainedAgainstS&D
16 Jun 2026Amendment 7, adding text after recital AI Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesAbstainedAgainstS&D
Show all 60 votes
Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
16 Jun 2026Separate vote on recital U Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesAbstainedForS&D
16 Jun 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 33 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesAbstainedAgainstS&D
16 Jun 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 25 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesAbstainedAgainstS&D
16 Jun 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 18 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesForAgainstS&D
16 Jun 2026Amendment 10 to paragraph 15 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesForAgainstS&D
16 Jun 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesForAgainstS&D
29 Apr 2026Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 66 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainstS&D
29 Apr 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 63 Discharge 2024: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeAbstainedAgainstS&D
29 Apr 2026Amendment 41 to paragraph 53 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentForAgainstS&D
28 Apr 2026Amendment 34 to paragraph 71 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAgainstS&D

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Gabriela FIREA , S&D · Romania 5.8 %1 0321644034

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 26 Sept 2026, 03:32 UTC (data stamp 579b2832c723, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Gabriela FIREA”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257098&to=2026-09-26 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-26,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Gabriela FIREA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257098&to=2026-09-26}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257098&to=2026-09-26},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}