Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes185All roll calls1 755
Order Highest rate firstBy name

Showing Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ only. Show every member

Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ’s votes against the line, 78

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
17 Sept 2026Recital F — part 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForGreens
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 12 — part 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForGreens
17 Sept 2026Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAbstainedGreens
17 Sept 2026Amendment 48 to paragraph 8 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAbstainedForGreens
17 Sept 2026Amendment 30 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAbstainedForGreens
17 Sept 2026Amendment 64 to paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForGreens
17 Sept 2026Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstAbstainedGreens
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstGreens
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 22 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstGreens
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 20 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstGreens
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 13 — part 1 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstGreens
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 12 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstGreens
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 4 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstGreens
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstGreens
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstGreens
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 4 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstGreens
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 4 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstGreens
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 2 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstGreens
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 1 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstGreens
17 Sept 2026Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstForGreens
17 Sept 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food securityForAgainstGreens
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 60 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstForGreens
16 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureAbstainedForGreens
16 Sept 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V)AgainstForGreens
16 Sept 2026Proposal to reject the text Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V)ForAgainstGreens
16 Sept 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V)AgainstForGreens
16 Sept 2026Proposal to reject the text Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V)ForAgainstGreens
16 Sept 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and simplification of security and defence procurement (Omnibus V)AgainstForGreens
15 Sept 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 36 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027AbstainedAgainstGreens
15 Sept 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 36 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027AbstainedAgainstGreens
15 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAbstainedForGreens
15 Sept 2026Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 44 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldForAgainstGreens
15 Sept 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 32 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldForAgainstGreens
15 Sept 2026Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 24 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldForAgainstGreens
15 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 12 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAgainstForGreens
15 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 4 Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditureAgainstForGreens
15 Sept 2026Amendment 88, adding text after Recital 3 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation FundForAgainstGreens
9 Jul 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 3 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, SudanForAgainstGreens
9 Jul 2026Amendment 30 to Article 1, after paragraph 2 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAgainstForGreens
8 Jul 2026Amendment 7, adding text after recital V 2025 Commission report on UkraineAbstainedAgainstGreens
8 Jul 2026Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 108 2025 Commission report on UkraineForAbstainedGreens
8 Jul 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 71 2025 Commission report on UkraineAbstainedAgainstGreens
8 Jul 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 31 2025 Commission report on UkraineAbstainedAgainstGreens
8 Jul 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 31 2025 Commission report on UkraineForAgainstGreens
8 Jul 2026Separate vote on paragraph 14 2025 Commission report on UkraineAbstainedForGreens
8 Jul 2026Separate vote on paragraph 13 2025 Commission report on UkraineAbstainedForGreens
8 Jul 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 3 2025 Commission report on UkraineForAgainstGreens
8 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AgainstAbstainedGreens
18 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandAbstainedForGreens
18 Jun 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital N Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandAbstainedAgainstGreens
Show all 78 votes
Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
18 Jun 2026Separate vote on recital J Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandAbstainedForGreens
18 Jun 2026Separate vote on recital C Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandAbstainedForGreens
18 Jun 2026Recital B — part 1 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandAbstainedForGreens
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 25 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandForAbstainedGreens
18 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 25 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandForAgainstGreens
18 Jun 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 25 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandForAgainstGreens
18 Jun 2026Paragraph 9 — part 1 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandAgainstForGreens
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina FasoForAbstainedGreens
17 Jun 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 2025 Commission report on GeorgiaForAgainstGreens
17 Jun 2026Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 43 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeForAbstainedGreens
17 Jun 2026Amendment 48, adding text after paragraph 43 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeForAgainstGreens
16 Jun 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Role of trade in strengthening the EU’s economic securityAbstainedForGreens
16 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic valuesAbstainedForGreens
16 Jun 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)AbstainedForGreens
26 Mar 2026Amendment 107 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)ForAgainstGreens
26 Mar 2026Amendment 106 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)ForAgainstGreens
26 Mar 2026Amendment 105 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)ForAgainstGreens
26 Mar 2026Amendment 103 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)ForAgainstGreens
26 Mar 2026Amendment 82 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)AgainstForGreens
26 Mar 2026Amendment 81 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)AgainstForGreens
26 Mar 2026Amendment 58, adding text after recital 4 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaForAbstainedGreens
26 Mar 2026Amendment 57, adding text after recital 4 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaForAbstainedGreens
26 Mar 2026Amendment 56, adding text after recital 3 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaForAbstainedGreens
26 Mar 2026Amendment 55, adding text after recital 2 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaForAbstainedGreens
26 Mar 2026Amendment 53, adding text after recital 2 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaForAbstainedGreens
26 Mar 2026Amendment 52, adding text after recital 2 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaForAbstainedGreens
26 Mar 2026Amendment 51, adding text after recital 2 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaForAbstainedGreens
26 Mar 2026Amendment 49, adding text after recital 1 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaForAbstainedGreens

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ , Greens · Spain 9.2 %8464419150

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257015&to=2026-09-25
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257015&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257015&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257015&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}