Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Pina PICIERNO

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite

Export

Period Term 2024 2025 2026 Last 6 months

Custom dates

Votes Final votes185 All roll calls1 755

Order Highest rate first By name

Showing Pina PICIERNO only. Show every member

Group Country Lead committee Topic (model-assigned) Contested votes only (largest side under 80 %)

Pina PICIERNO’s votes against the line, 35

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

**Position**: the member’s vote. **Clear line**: the position of at least two thirds of **Group** (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
Date	Vote	Position	Clear line	Group
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 61, adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Abstained	Against	Renew
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 60, adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	For	Against	Renew
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Abstained	Against	Renew
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Abstained	Against	Renew
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 62 to paragraph 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Abstained	Against	Renew
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Abstained	Against	Renew
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	For	Against	Renew
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 13 to recital C — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers	For	Against	Renew
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 13 to recital C — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers	For	Against	Renew
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers	For	Against	Renew
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers	For	Against	Renew
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 1 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality	For	Against	Renew
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 31 2025 Commission report on Ukraine	For	Against	Renew
8 Jul 2026	Paragraph 27 — part 1 2025 Commission report on Ukraine	Against	For	Renew
18 Jun 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines	For	Against	Renew
18 Jun 2026	Amendment 1 to paragraph 6 — part 3 Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines	For	Against	Renew
17 Jun 2026	Final vote General arrangements for excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products	For	Against	Renew
17 Jun 2026	Amendments 67 + 70 (voted as one) to Article 20 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)	Abstained	Against	Renew
17 Jun 2026	Proposal to reject the text Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation)	For	Against	Renew
20 May 2026	Amendment 42 to paragraph 1, after point d Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly	For	Abstained	S&D
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 2, adding text after recital BE Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Against	For	S&D
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 15 — part 1 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Auditors	Against	For	S&D
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 2 to paragraph 5 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union	For	Against	S&D
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 28 to paragraph 247, after point iv Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission	For	Against	S&D
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 56 to paragraph 202 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission	For	Against	S&D
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 7 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU	For	Against	S&D
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 37 Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2024	Against	For	S&D
28 Apr 2026	Amendments 125 + 129 (voted as one), adding text after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120) Generalised scheme of tariff preferences	For	Against	S&D
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 6 to paragraph 60 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III	For	Against	S&D
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 38 to paragraph 100 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	For	Against	S&D
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 21 to paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	For	Against	S&D
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 37 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	For	Against	S&D
26 Mar 2026	Amendment 87 to Article 1 — part 2 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)	For	Against	S&D
26 Mar 2026	Amendment 87 to Article 1 — part 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)	For	Against	S&D
26 Mar 2026	Amendment 60, adding text after recital 9 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America	For	Abstained	S&D

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

**Against the line**: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ **clear-line votes** (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: **opposite** (for ↔ against), **abstained** against the line, **other** (for or against when the line was to abstain), and **with own party** — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
Member	Against the line	Clear-line votes	Opposite	Abstained	Other	With own party
Pina PICIERNO changed group , Renew · Italy in S&D for most of the period	2.4 %	1 433	27	6	2	0

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).

Export

Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=124846&to=2026-09-25
Data source: European Parliament Open Data
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Pina PICIERNO”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=124846&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Pina PICIERNO}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=124846&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=124846&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}