A decision can have many votes: amendments, split parts, the final vote.
| Date | Vote | Kind | Result | For | Requested by | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 2, adding text after recital G Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Amendment | 499 for, 112 against, 41 abstained Adopted | For 77 % | Requested by Renew | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 4, adding text after recital Ea Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Amendment | 212 for, 421 against, 15 abstained Rejected | For 33 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 1, adding text after recital Ea Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Amendment | 589 for, 51 against, 5 abstained Adopted | For 91 % | Requested by Renew | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 12 to paragraph 22 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Amendment | 349 for, 287 against, 7 abstained Adopted | For 54 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 14 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Amendment | 543 for, 59 against, 41 abstained Adopted | For 84 % | Requested by Renew | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 10a Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Amendment | 205 for, 439 against, 5 abstained Rejected | For 32 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 9a Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Amendment | 194 for, 441 against, 14 abstained Rejected | For 30 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 9a Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Amendment | 207 for, 431 against, 9 abstained Rejected | For 32 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 8 to paragraph 7a Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Amendment | 347 for, 277 against, 10 abstained Adopted | For 55 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 5 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Amendment | 350 for, 277 against, 13 abstained Adopted | For 55 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 4 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Amendment | 169 for, 440 against, 30 abstained Rejected | For 26 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 5 to paragraph 3 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Amendment | 202 for, 442 against, 4 abstained Rejected | For 31 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | Final | 417 for, 234 against, 9 abstained Adopted | For 63 % | Select | |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Separate vote on recital M Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | Separate vote | 645 for, 8 against, 9 abstained Adopted | For 97 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 1 to recital H Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | Amendment | 189 for, 461 against, 12 abstained Rejected | For 29 % | Requested by ESN | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Separate vote on recital G Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | Separate vote | 420 for, 198 against, 43 abstained Adopted | For 64 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Recital F — part 2 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | Split vote | 428 for, 204 against, 19 abstained Adopted | For 66 % | Requested by ESN, Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Separate vote on recital C Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | Separate vote | 645 for, 14 against, 0 abstained Adopted | For 98 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Recital B — part 2 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | Split vote | 427 for, 212 against, 24 abstained Adopted | For 64 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 12 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | Amendment | 198 for, 441 against, 11 abstained Rejected | For 30 % | Requested by ESN | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | Amendment | 195 for, 439 against, 8 abstained Rejected | For 30 % | Requested by ESN | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Paragraph 3 — part 3 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | Split vote | 379 for, 216 against, 53 abstained Adopted | For 58 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | Amendment | 202 for, 445 against, 5 abstained Rejected | For 31 % | Requested by ESN | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Paragraph 2 — part 2 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | Split vote | 419 for, 193 against, 37 abstained Adopted | For 65 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Paragraph 2 — part 1 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | Split vote | 645 for, 12 against, 0 abstained Adopted | For 98 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises | Final | 444 for, 153 against, 55 abstained Adopted | For 68 % | Select | |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Paragraph 10 — part 2 Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises | Split vote | 325 for, 290 against, 31 abstained Adopted | For 50 % | Requested by The Left, S&D | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Safeguarding and promoting financial stability amid economic uncertainties | Final | 491 for, 83 against, 84 abstained Adopted | For 75 % | Select | |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies | Final | 420 for, 207 against, 20 abstained Adopted | For 65 % | Select | |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 10, adding text after recital F Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies | Amendment | 207 for, 425 against, 14 abstained Rejected | For 32 % | Requested by ESN | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 3 to recital F Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies | Amendment | 187 for, 436 against, 24 abstained Rejected | For 29 % | Requested by ECR | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 2 to recital E Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies | Amendment | 178 for, 454 against, 20 abstained Rejected | For 27 % | Requested by ECR | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 1 to recital A Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies | Amendment | 288 for, 294 against, 63 abstained Rejected | For 45 % | Requested by ECR | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 10 Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies | Amendment | 175 for, 455 against, 23 abstained Rejected | For 27 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Final | 492 for, 144 against, 28 abstained Adopted | For 74 % | Select | |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 32, adding text after recital E The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Amendment | 190 for, 450 against, 13 abstained Rejected | For 29 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 31, adding text after recital C The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Amendment | 193 for, 464 against, 3 abstained Rejected | For 29 % | Requested by The Left, Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Separate vote on citation 2 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Separate vote | 491 for, 139 against, 20 abstained Adopted | For 76 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 30 to citation 2 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Amendment | 199 for, 445 against, 10 abstained Rejected | For 30 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 27 to paragraph 41 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Amendment | 162 for, 484 against, 18 abstained Rejected | For 24 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 35 to paragraph 40 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Amendment | 124 for, 500 against, 28 abstained Rejected | For 19 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 26 to paragraph 40 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Amendment | 136 for, 487 against, 24 abstained Rejected | For 21 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendments 25 + 34 (voted as one) to paragraph 37 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Amendment | 191 for, 423 against, 48 abstained Rejected | For 29 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 29 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Amendment | 79 for, 561 against, 15 abstained Rejected | For 12 % | Requested by The Left | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 14 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Amendment | 81 for, 518 against, 56 abstained Rejected | For 12 % | Requested by The Left | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 14 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Amendment | 78 for, 528 against, 58 abstained Rejected | For 12 % | Requested by The Left | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 10 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Amendment | 135 for, 471 against, 52 abstained Rejected | For 21 % | Requested by ESN | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 7 to paragraph 10 — part 2 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Amendment | 103 for, 500 against, 61 abstained Rejected | For 16 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 2 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Amendment | 190 for, 454 against, 16 abstained Rejected | For 29 % | Requested by ESN | Select |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 33 to paragraph 2 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Amendment | 196 for, 446 against, 15 abstained Rejected | For 30 % | Requested by Patriots | Select |