Skip to content

A decision can have many votes: amendments, split parts, the final vote.

Roll-call votes

8 votes recorded by name · decision No. 15 of 10 Sept 2025

Export
More filters

A group’s line is counted with members in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested bySelect
10 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interferenceFinal490 for, 65 against, 86 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by RenewSelect
10 Sept 2025Amendment 4, adding text after recital F Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interferenceAmendment479 for, 34 against, 126 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by ECRSelect
10 Sept 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 16 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interferenceAmendment463 for, 110 against, 73 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by ECRSelect
10 Sept 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 13 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interferenceAmendment344 for, 106 against, 199 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by ECRSelect
10 Sept 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 13 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interferenceAmendment300 for, 114 against, 222 abstained Adopted For 47 %Requested by ECRSelect
10 Sept 2025Paragraph 12 — part 3 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interferenceSplit vote287 for, 279 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 46 %Requested by ECRSelect
10 Sept 2025Paragraph 12 — part 2 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interferenceSplit vote271 for, 297 against, 50 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by ECRSelect
10 Sept 2025Paragraph 12 — part 1 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interferenceSplit vote520 for, 102 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by ECRSelect