Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4 to paragraph 7

Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro

Vote
Amendment 4 to paragraph 7
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
153 for · 424 against · 5 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:12
More facts (6)
Position
vote 4 of 16 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
RC-B10-0394/2026 – § 7 – Am 4
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0400
Dossier
2026/2874(RSP)
Vote id
197238
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 153 for, 424 against, 5 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 26 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 34Abst. 0No vote 10 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 111Abst. 0No vote 24 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 65Abst. 0No vote 13 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 153Abst. 0No vote 31 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 73Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 60Against 0Abst. 0No vote 24 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 18Against 2Abst. 2No vote 5 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.73
No groupFor 2Against 13Abst. 3No vote 10 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium100
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Czechia200
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain200
Finland100
France400
Greece200
Croatia100
Italy2200
Lithuania200
Latvia200
Netherlands300
Poland1700
Romania600
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 582 members

No vote recorded, 135

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 135 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 89 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment189 for, 438 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 517 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 108 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment195 for, 433 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 519 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 45 to paragraph 61 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment178 for, 463 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.96 550 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 98 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment199 for, 436 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 519 voters
10 Mar 2026Proposal to vote on amendments Harmonising certain aspects of insolvency lawProcedural164 for, 447 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.96 500 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 259 to recital 18 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment179 for, 457 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greens, ESN, ECRr · shared0.96 525 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 7 to recital AY The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment175 for, 378 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 466 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 88 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment195 for, 443 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 522 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 96 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment189 for, 443 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 520 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 101 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment196 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 518 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 3 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197238
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 4 to paragraph 7 — Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197238, reference 2026/2874(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197238 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197238,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4 to paragraph 7 — Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197238}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197238},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197238, reference 2026/2874(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}