Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 22

Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 22
Result
452 for · 119 against · 39 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:30
More facts (6)
Position
vote 22 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens, The Left
Official label
B10-0386/2026 – § 22
Vote id
196836
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 452 for, 119 against, 39 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 74 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 35Abst. 1No vote 7 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
GreensFor 4Against 45Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
S&DFor 83Against 28Abst. 2No vote 22 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.60
RenewFor 60Against 6Abst. 0No vote 12 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
EPPFor 153Against 1Abst. 0No vote 30 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 68Against 2Abst. 4No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 3Against 0Abst. 22No vote 2 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.82
No groupFor 11Against 2Abst. 10No vote 5 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0150
Denmark020
Spain400
Finland010
France040
Croatia010
Italy040
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands050
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 610 members

No vote recorded, 107

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 107 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Attack against citizens in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in ModenaOther355 for, 86 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.74 396 voters
8 Oct 2025Final vote Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penaltiesFinal492 for, 111 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.74 544 voters
21 Jan 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU/Republic of Serbia agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of SerbiaFinal505 for, 90 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.73 541 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?Final426 for, 119 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.72 511 voters
17 Sept 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food securityFinal467 for, 92 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.72 596 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 116 + 117 + 316 + 1 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment536 for, 100 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.72 546 voters
18 Dec 2025Final vote — text as a whole Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gearFinal450 for, 93 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 78 %r · shared0.71 503 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendments 92 + 133 (voted as one) to paragraph 2 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment564 for, 97 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.71 561 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 53 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote480 for, 111 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.70 522 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 371 to Annex VII, Part C, point 13 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment530 for, 112 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 82 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.69 539 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 22 — Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 196836, reference 2026/2778(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196836 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-196836,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 22 — Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196836}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196836},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196836, reference 2026/2778(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}