Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 13 — part 2

Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up

Vote
Paragraph 13 — part 2
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
275 for · 270 against · 64 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:29
More facts (6)
Position
vote 19 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens, EPP · split vote: EPP, The Left
Official label
B10-0386/2026 – § 13/2
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0388
Dossier
2026/2778(RSP)
Vote id
196833
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 275 for, 270 against, 64 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 45 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “the implementation of”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 98Against 14Abst. 0No vote 23 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
RenewFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 8Against 148Abst. 0No vote 28 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
ECRFor 5Against 68Abst. 1No vote 10 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 0Against 12Abst. 56No vote 16 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.74
ESNFor 5Against 18Abst. 2No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.58
No groupFor 8Against 10Abst. 5No vote 5 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia100
Germany0130
France010
Hungary100
Italy100
Lithuania010
Poland200
Slovakia002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 609 members

No vote recorded, 108

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 108 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 79 to paragraph 18 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment308 for, 309 against, 55 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&D, The Leftr · shared0.85 560 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment272 for, 256 against, 77 abstained Adopted For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 598 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 595 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 24 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote337 for, 303 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.83 588 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 46 — part 2 2025 Commission report on AlbaniaAmendment301 for, 273 against, 77 abstained Adopted For 46 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 566 voters
15 Jun 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S&D Group — AI Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AIOther244 for, 179 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 56 %r · shared0.82 387 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 41 to recital 22 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment302 for, 335 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 45 %r · shared0.82 564 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point aa — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote251 for, 296 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 488 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 60 2023 and 2024 reports on MontenegroAmendment276 for, 307 against, 64 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 540 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 3 to recital B The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in PakistanAmendment310 for, 261 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 516 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196833
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 13 — part 2 — Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 196833, reference 2026/2778(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196833 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-196833,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 13 — part 2 — Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196833}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196833},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196833, reference 2026/2778(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}