Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 12

Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 12
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
475 for · 121 against · 8 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:29
More facts (6)
Position
vote 17 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · separate vote: The Left
Official label
B10-0386/2026 – § 12
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0388
Dossier
2026/2778(RSP)
Vote id
196830
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 475 for, 121 against, 8 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 79 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 37Abst. 0No vote 7 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 5Against 44Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
S&DFor 90Against 23Abst. 0No vote 22 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.69
RenewFor 55Against 8Abst. 0No vote 15 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
EPPFor 151Against 5Abst. 0No vote 28 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 67Against 1Abst. 3No vote 13 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 67Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 2No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 17Against 3Abst. 3No vote 5 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Czechia010
Germany700
Spain100
France100
Greece112
Luxembourg100
Poland001
Romania100
Slovenia100
Slovakia410

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 604 members

No vote recorded, 113

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 113 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2024Paragraph 63 — part 9 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsSplit vote506 for, 111 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.76 532 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Attack against citizens in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in ModenaOther355 for, 86 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.75 391 voters
17 Sept 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food securityFinal467 for, 92 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.75 590 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Nov 2025Amendments 92 + 133 (voted as one) to paragraph 2 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment564 for, 97 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.74 554 voters
18 Dec 2025Final vote — text as a whole Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gearFinal450 for, 93 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 78 %r · shared0.73 496 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 116 + 117 + 316 + 1 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment536 for, 100 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.72 540 voters
10 Jul 2025Final vote Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policiesFinal542 for, 97 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 83 %r · shared0.72 545 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 11 — part 4 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote477 for, 120 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.71 514 voters
8 May 2025Final vote CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Final458 for, 101 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.71 488 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendments 82 + 122 (voted as one) to Article 1 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment556 for, 102 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.71 556 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196830
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 12 — Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 196830, reference 2026/2778(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196830 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-196830,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 12 — Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196830}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196830},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196830, reference 2026/2778(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}