Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 5 — part 3

Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up

Vote
Paragraph 5 — part 3
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
489 for · 116 against · 9 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:28
More facts (6)
Position
vote 15 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: Greens
Official label
B10-0386/2026 – § 5/3
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0388
Dossier
2026/2778(RSP)
Vote id
196828
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 489 for, 116 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 80 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “and to revise the fishing-capacity framework”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 36Abst. 0No vote 7 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 4Against 45Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
S&DFor 89Against 26Abst. 0No vote 20 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.66
RenewFor 64Against 2Abst. 1No vote 11 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 156Against 0Abst. 0No vote 28 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 69Against 4Abst. 0No vote 11 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 22Against 0Abst. 3No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
No groupFor 15Against 3Abst. 5No vote 5 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Czechia010
Germany700
Spain100
France100
Greece013
Luxembourg100
Poland001
Romania100
Slovenia100
Slovakia311

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 614 members

No vote recorded, 103

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 103 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Attack against citizens in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in ModenaOther355 for, 86 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.78 398 voters
17 Sept 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food securityFinal467 for, 92 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.77 600 voters
18 Dec 2025Final vote — text as a whole Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gearFinal450 for, 93 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 78 %r · shared0.76 506 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Jul 2025Final vote Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policiesFinal542 for, 97 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 83 %r · shared0.74 554 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 116 + 117 + 316 + 1 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment536 for, 100 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.73 550 voters
8 May 2025Final vote CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Final458 for, 101 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.73 496 voters
21 Jan 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU/Republic of Serbia agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of SerbiaFinal505 for, 90 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.73 544 voters
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?Final426 for, 119 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.73 514 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 20 — part 2 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Split vote487 for, 97 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.73 530 voters
12 Mar 2026Final vote Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Final473 for, 81 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 84 %r · shared0.72 492 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196828
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 5 — part 3 — Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 196828, reference 2026/2778(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196828 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-196828,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 5 — part 3 — Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196828}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196828},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196828, reference 2026/2778(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}