Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 4 — part 3

Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up

Vote
Paragraph 4 — part 3
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
474 for · 126 against · 12 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:28
More facts (6)
Position
vote 11 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: The Left, Greens
Official label
B10-0386/2026 – § 4/3
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0388
Dossier
2026/2778(RSP)
Vote id
196823
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 474 for, 126 against, 12 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 77 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “alongside greater flexibility,”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 34Abst. 2No vote 7 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
GreensFor 4Against 44Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
S&DFor 79Against 35Abst. 1No vote 20 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.53
RenewFor 58Against 8Abst. 0No vote 12 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
EPPFor 155Against 1Abst. 0No vote 28 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 69Against 1Abst. 3No vote 11 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 2No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 16Against 3Abst. 4No vote 5 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium300
Bulgaria200
Germany700
Denmark310
Spain100
Finland300
France1200
Ireland300
Italy200
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands700
Poland100
Portugal200
Romania200
Sweden210
Slovenia200
Slovakia060

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 612 members

No vote recorded, 105

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 105 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Attack against citizens in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in ModenaOther355 for, 86 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.78 398 voters
8 Oct 2025Final vote Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penaltiesFinal492 for, 111 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.76 546 voters
23 Oct 2024Paragraph 63 — part 9 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsSplit vote506 for, 111 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.76 539 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?Final426 for, 119 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.76 512 voters
8 May 2025Paragraph 30 — part 2 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketSplit vote375 for, 92 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.74 412 voters
17 Sept 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food securityFinal467 for, 92 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.72 598 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendments 92 + 133 (voted as one) to paragraph 2 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment564 for, 97 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.71 561 voters
21 Jan 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Bosnia and HerzegovinaFinal565 for, 83 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 85 %r · shared0.70 560 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 116 + 117 + 316 + 1 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment536 for, 100 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.69 548 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 21 — part 4 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote487 for, 125 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 78 %r · shared0.69 529 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196823
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 4 — part 3 — Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 196823, reference 2026/2778(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196823 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-196823,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 4 — part 3 — Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196823}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196823},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196823, reference 2026/2778(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}