Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 4 — part 2

Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up

Vote
Paragraph 4 — part 2
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
499 for · 95 against · 19 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:28
More facts (6)
Position
vote 10 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: The Left, Greens
Official label
B10-0386/2026 – § 4/2
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0388
Dossier
2026/2778(RSP)
Vote id
196822
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 499 for, 95 against, 19 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 81 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “, particularly in mixed fisheries and in situations where choke species generate disproportionate socio-economic consequences;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 21Against 7Abst. 9No vote 7 of 44Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.35
GreensFor 3Against 46Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 88Against 25Abst. 1No vote 21 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.66
RenewFor 58Against 8Abst. 1No vote 11 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
EPPFor 155Against 2Abst. 0No vote 27 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 70Against 1Abst. 3No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 68Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 2No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 13Against 6Abst. 3No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria300
Czechia100
Germany1300
France100
Hungary100
Italy100
Lithuania100
Poland200
Slovakia002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 613 members

No vote recorded, 104

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 104 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food securityFinal467 for, 92 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.73 599 voters
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?Final426 for, 119 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.71 514 voters
8 Oct 2025Final vote Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penaltiesFinal492 for, 111 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.65 547 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 Jan 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Bosnia and HerzegovinaFinal565 for, 83 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 85 %r · shared0.64 561 voters
16 Jun 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainFinal560 for, 75 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 85 %r · shared0.63 570 voters
21 Jan 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU/Republic of Serbia agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of SerbiaFinal505 for, 90 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.60 543 voters
16 Sept 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Switzerland Agreement on the transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crimeFinal549 for, 75 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 84 %r · shared0.59 587 voters
20 May 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision United Nations Convention against CybercrimeFinal497 for, 91 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 78 %r · shared0.59 548 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendments 92 + 133 (voted as one) to paragraph 2 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment564 for, 97 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.58 562 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendments 82 + 122 (voted as one) to Article 1 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment556 for, 102 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.58 564 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196822
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 4 — part 2 — Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 196822, reference 2026/2778(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196822 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-196822,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 4 — part 2 — Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196822}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196822},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196822, reference 2026/2778(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}