Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 2 to paragraph 1

Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up

Vote
Amendment 2 to paragraph 1
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
134 for · 436 against · 35 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:26
More facts (6)
Position
vote 1 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
B10-0386/2026 – § 1 – Am 2
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0388
Dossier
2026/2778(RSP)
Vote id
196810
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 134 for, 436 against, 35 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 22 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 4Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
S&DFor 30Against 82Abst. 0No vote 23 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.60
RenewFor 2Against 65Abst. 0No vote 11 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 6Against 148Abst. 0No vote 30 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 2Against 68Abst. 3No vote 11 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 0Against 43Abst. 26No vote 15 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.43
ESNFor 3Against 21Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
No groupFor 12Against 5Abst. 6No vote 5 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Germany100
Denmark100
Spain400
Finland300
France800
Greece100
Ireland200
Italy900
Netherlands100
Portugal100
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 605 members

No vote recorded, 112

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 112 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Dec 2025Proposal to reject the text Corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsRejection117 for, 540 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 18 %r · shared0.76 555 voters
13 Nov 2025Proposal to reject the text Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsRejection105 for, 529 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 16 %r · shared0.74 536 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment112 for, 330 against, 124 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 493 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
30 Apr 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital B Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in HaitiAmendment86 for, 415 against, 66 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 490 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 87 to paragraph 52 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment106 for, 489 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.72 517 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 46, adding text before paragraph 1 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment106 for, 503 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 538 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 82, adding text after recital 1 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)Amendment94 for, 503 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 532 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 24 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment98 for, 513 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 518 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 92, adding text after paragraph 43 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment116 for, 481 against, 53 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.71 542 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 38 to paragraph 56 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment131 for, 518 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.71 565 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196810
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 — Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 196810, reference 2026/2778(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196810 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-196810,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 — Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196810}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196810},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196810, reference 2026/2778(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}