Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital AD — part 2

Impact of social media and the online environment on young people

Vote
Recital AD — part 2
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
413 for · 143 against · 50 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:23
More facts (6)
Position
vote 12 of 13 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: Members (B)
Official label
A10-0220/2026 – Sandro Ruotolo – Recital AD/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0220
Dossier
2025/2081(INI)
Vote id
196809
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 413 for, 143 against, 50 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 68 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 114Against 0Abst. 0No vote 21 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 66Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 127Against 8Abst. 18No vote 31 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.75
ECRFor 10Against 62Abst. 0No vote 12 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
PatriotsFor 4Against 39Abst. 26No vote 15 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.35
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 8Against 10Abst. 5No vote 5 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0121
France010
Hungary010
Italy010
Lithuania010
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 606 members

No vote recorded, 111

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 111 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote373 for, 139 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 487 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote423 for, 108 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 482 voters
20 May 2026Separate vote on citation 25 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote451 for, 145 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.88 556 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2024Paragraph 78 — part 3 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsSplit vote452 for, 142 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 70 %r · shared0.88 535 voters
11 Mar 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectorsSplit vote449 for, 139 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 528 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 57 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment421 for, 185 against, 36 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 536 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point r — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote389 for, 153 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 480 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 11 — part 2 Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesAmendment456 for, 134 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 533 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 61 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote416 for, 187 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 537 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 96 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote413 for, 197 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 528 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 6 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196809
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital AD — part 2 — Impact of social media and the online environment on young people”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 196809, reference 2025/2081(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196809 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-196809,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital AD — part 2 — Impact of social media and the online environment on young people}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196809}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196809},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196809, reference 2025/2081(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}