Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the motion for a resolution

The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food security

Vote
Final vote on the motion for a resolution
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
467 for · 92 against · 44 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:26
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
A10-0205/2026 – Paulo do Nascimento Cabral – Motion for a resolution
Text
Report A-10-2026-0205
Dossier
2025/2010(INI)
Vote id
196157
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 467 for, 92 against, 44 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 77 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 19Abst. 13No vote 10 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
GreensFor 5Against 42Abst. 1No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
S&DFor 102Against 13Abst. 0No vote 20 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
RenewFor 42Against 6Abst. 18No vote 12 of 78Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.45
EPPFor 152Against 0Abst. 0No vote 32 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 69Against 4Abst. 0No vote 11 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 60Against 0Abst. 8No vote 16 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
ESNFor 22Against 0Abst. 2No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 13Against 8Abst. 2No vote 5 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria500
Cyprus200
Czechia500
Germany2700
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain1800
Finland200
France400
Greece100
Croatia600
Hungary500
Ireland100
Italy800
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands300
Poland2200
Portugal700
Romania600
Sweden400
Slovenia400
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 603 members

No vote recorded, 114

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 114 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 20 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSeparate vote480 for, 116 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.77 601 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote489 for, 116 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.77 600 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 1 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote478 for, 117 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.75 594 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 13 — part 1 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote490 for, 120 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.75 599 voters
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 12 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSeparate vote475 for, 121 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.75 590 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 2 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote461 for, 130 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 76 %r · shared0.74 592 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 4 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote499 for, 95 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.73 599 voters
21 Jan 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Bosnia and HerzegovinaFinal565 for, 83 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 85 %r · shared0.72 553 voters
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?Final426 for, 119 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.72 509 voters
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 22 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSeparate vote452 for, 119 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by Greens, The Leftr · shared0.72 596 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196157
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the motion for a resolution — The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food security”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 196157, reference 2025/2010(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196157 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-196157,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the motion for a resolution — The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food security}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196157}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196157},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196157, reference 2025/2010(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}