Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 5

Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowances

Vote
Amendment 5
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
367 for · 291 against · 7 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:23
More facts (6)
Position
vote 6 of 11 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0230/2026 – Pierfrancesco Maran – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes – Am 5
Text
Report A-10-2026-0230
Dossier
2026/0085(COD)
Vote id
196498
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 367 for, 291 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 55 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 42Against 9Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
S&DFor 116Against 9Abst. 0No vote 10 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
RenewFor 69Against 4Abst. 1No vote 4 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
EPPFor 99Against 76Abst. 0No vote 9 of 184Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.35
ECRFor 0Against 74Abst. 0No vote 10 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 74Abst. 0No vote 10 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 27Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 2Against 18Abst. 6No vote 2 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium140
Bulgaria300
Germany800
Denmark400
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland300
France1300
Ireland400
Italy001
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands700
Poland100
Portugal200
Romania300
Sweden300
Slovenia200
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 665 members

No vote recorded, 52

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 52 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Final vote Framework for achieving climate neutralityFinal379 for, 248 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 59 %r · shared0.84 587 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 11, adding text after recital 8 — part 2 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment376 for, 248 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 587 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralitySeparate vote378 for, 244 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 59 %r · shared0.83 586 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 14 to Article 1 — part 2 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment384 for, 242 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.82 588 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 38 to Article 1 — part 2 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment375 for, 242 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by ECR, Greensr · shared0.82 587 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 8 Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectorAmendment361 for, 242 against, 36 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECR, Patriots, Membersr · shared0.81 589 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively — Ams 1-10, 13, 18-25, 27-30, 32-35, 37, 40 Framework for achieving climate neutralityOther396 for, 229 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.79 591 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralitySeparate vote406 for, 222 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.78 587 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralitySeparate vote406 for, 221 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.77 590 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 121 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote362 for, 188 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.77 530 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 5 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196498
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 5 — Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowances”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196498, reference 2026/0085(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196498 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196498,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 5 — Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowances}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196498}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196498},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196498, reference 2026/0085(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}