Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 80 to recital CL

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Amendment 80 to recital CL
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
153 for · 450 against · 60 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:55
More facts (6)
Position
vote 137 of 139 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – Recital CL – Am 80
Text
Report A-10-2026-0199
Dossier
2025/2069(INI)
Vote id
196431
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 153 for, 450 against, 60 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 23 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 3Against 32Abst. 2No vote 7 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
GreensFor 0Against 50Abst. 1No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 5Against 119Abst. 0No vote 11 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 5Against 68Abst. 1No vote 4 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
EPPFor 7Against 168Abst. 0No vote 9 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 75Against 0Abst. 2No vote 7 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 35Against 0Abst. 39No vote 10 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.29
ESNFor 19Against 1Abst. 6No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.60
No groupFor 4Against 12Abst. 9No vote 3 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria012
Czechia100
Germany1301
France100
Hungary100
Italy001
Lithuania100
Poland200
Slovakia002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 663 members

No vote recorded, 54

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 54 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 7 Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroAmendment153 for, 424 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 563 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 8 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Amendment134 for, 283 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 408 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Amendment148 for, 285 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 422 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranAmendment178 for, 379 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 531 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 89 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment189 for, 438 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 583 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 67 to recital H Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment160 for, 432 against, 37 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 582 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 12 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranAmendment165 for, 386 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 532 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 5 Case of Boualem Sansal in AlgeriaAmendment164 for, 435 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.84 566 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 101 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment196 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.84 586 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 164 to paragraph 74 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment194 for, 472 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.84 617 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196431
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 80 to recital CL — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196431, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196431 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196431,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 80 to recital CL — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196431}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196431},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196431, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}