Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 56, after Recital BT

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Amendment 56, after Recital BT
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
502 for · 90 against · 58 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:54
More facts (6)
Position
vote 134 of 139 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After Recital BT – Am 56
Text
Report A-10-2026-0199
Dossier
2025/2069(INI)
Vote id
196429
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 502 for, 90 against, 58 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 77 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 20Against 12Abst. 6No vote 6 of 44Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.29
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 120Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 73Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 168Against 3Abst. 1No vote 12 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 42Against 3Abst. 31No vote 8 of 84Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.33
PatriotsFor 28Against 34Abst. 12No vote 10 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.19
ESNFor 1Against 22Abst. 2No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
No groupFor 2Against 16Abst. 6No vote 4 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium300
Bulgaria300
Cyprus010
Czechia400
Denmark100
Spain002
Finland100
France004
Greece020
Croatia100
Italy0021
Lithuania200
Latvia300
Netherlands300
Poland1600
Romania204
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 650 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 Jan 2026Separate vote on paragraph 7 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025Separate vote467 for, 109 against, 86 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.80 597 voters
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in UkraineFinal446 for, 63 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Renew, EPPr · shared0.80 510 voters
8 Jul 2025Paragraph 49 — part 2 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote519 for, 71 against, 71 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 597 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandFinal412 for, 63 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.79 487 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 22 — part 2 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanSplit vote478 for, 68 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.78 534 voters
12 Mar 2025Final vote — text as a whole Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggressionFinal442 for, 98 against, 126 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Renew, EPP, The Leftr · shared0.78 596 voters
24 Feb 2026Paragraph 8 — part 2 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineSplit vote445 for, 116 against, 36 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 544 voters
8 Jul 2026Paragraph 18 — part 3 2025 Commission report on UkraineSplit vote456 for, 104 against, 86 abstained Adopted For 71 %r · shared0.77 591 voters
13 Feb 2025Final vote — text as a whole Further deterioration of the political situation in GeorgiaFinal400 for, 63 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.77 492 voters
24 Feb 2026Paragraph 23 — part 2 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineSplit vote404 for, 131 against, 64 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.77 545 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196429
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 56, after Recital BT — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196429, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196429 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196429,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 56, after Recital BT — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196429}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196429},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196429, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}