Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Recital BT — part 2

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Recital BT — part 2
Result
459 for · 189 against · 14 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:54
More facts (6)
Position
vote 133 of 139 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN · split vote: ESN
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – Recital BT/2
Vote id
196428
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 459 for, 189 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 69 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “whereas such warfare requires an appropriate response and a shift from a mere defensive strategy to an offensive one;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 36Abst. 3No vote 4 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 122Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 74Against 0Abst. 1No vote 3 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 168Against 1Abst. 0No vote 15 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 40Against 30Abst. 7No vote 7 of 84Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.28
PatriotsFor 0Against 74Abst. 1No vote 9 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 1No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 4Against 22Abst. 1No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium400
Cyprus100
Germany1400
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain2000
Finland200
France1200
Greece400
Croatia400
Hungary100
Ireland100
Italy1900
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands400
Poland300
Portugal700
Romania700
Sweden500
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 662 members

No vote recorded, 55

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 55 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
30 Apr 2026Paragraph 15 — part 3 Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in UkraineSplit vote394 for, 124 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 70 %r · shared0.88 529 voters
19 Sept 2024Paragraph 19 — part 2 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesSplit vote424 for, 122 against, 61 abstained Adopted For 70 %r · shared0.88 556 voters
17 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on GeorgiaFinal436 for, 145 against, 47 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.88 583 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Paragraph 18 — part 4 2025 Commission report on UkraineSplit vote440 for, 167 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.88 603 voters
8 Jul 2026Separate vote on paragraph 21 2025 Commission report on UkraineSeparate vote462 for, 133 against, 56 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.87 603 voters
24 Feb 2026Paragraph 7 — part 2 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineSplit vote413 for, 115 against, 60 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 552 voters
13 Feb 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 Further deterioration of the political situation in GeorgiaSeparate vote390 for, 109 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 505 voters
24 Feb 2026Paragraph 6 — part 6 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineSplit vote405 for, 146 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by The Left, Patriots, EPPr · shared0.87 550 voters
24 Feb 2026Paragraph 23 — part 2 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineSplit vote404 for, 131 against, 64 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 559 voters
13 Feb 2025Paragraph 4 — part 1 Further deterioration of the political situation in GeorgiaSplit vote390 for, 98 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 509 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital BT — part 2 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196428, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196428 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196428,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital BT — part 2 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196428}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196428},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196428, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}