Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 73, after paragraph 132

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Amendment 73, after paragraph 132
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
204 for · 437 against · 14 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:52
More facts (6)
Position
vote 113 of 139 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 132 – Am 73
Text
Report A-10-2026-0199
Dossier
2025/2069(INI)
Vote id
196409
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 204 for, 437 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 3Against 28Abst. 8No vote 5 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.58
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 124Abst. 0No vote 11 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 2Against 71Abst. 0No vote 5 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 6Against 162Abst. 1No vote 15 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 76Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 73Against 1Abst. 0No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 19Against 0Abst. 4No vote 5 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Bulgaria050
Cyprus020
Czechia320
Germany0260
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0220
Finland040
France050
Greece060
Croatia060
Hungary060
Ireland030
Italy080
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta020
Netherlands040
Poland1220
Portugal050
Romania080
Sweden050
Slovenia220
Slovakia001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 655 members

No vote recorded, 62

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 62 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 50 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment198 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 642 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 22 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 567 voters
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR GroupOther110 for, 309 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.94 394 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment199 for, 438 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.94 585 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 6, adding text after recital D Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment187 for, 419 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 569 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 38 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment198 for, 458 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.94 596 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 17 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment198 for, 417 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 564 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 99 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment203 for, 426 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 578 voters
27 Apr 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — ‘One Europe, one market’ Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – ‘One Europe, one market’Other132 for, 327 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.94 426 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 614 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196409
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 73, after paragraph 132 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196409, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196409 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196409,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 73, after paragraph 132 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196409}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196409},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196409, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}