Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 25 — part 2, after paragraph 110

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Amendment 25 — part 2, after paragraph 110
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
118 for · 448 against · 89 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:51
More facts (6)
Position
vote 104 of 139 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: The Left
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 110 – Am 25/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0199
Dossier
2025/2069(INI)
Vote id
196402
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 118 for, 448 against, 89 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 18 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘recommends in this regard that an audit be performed on the general allowance of and all other forms of financial contributions to Members of the European Parliament on a yearly basis in order to increase Parliament’s transparency and trust in its Members among the citizens of the EU as well as reduce the risk of undue influence, interference or corruption;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 1Abst. 0No vote 5 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 17Against 33Abst. 1No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.47
S&DFor 18Against 101Abst. 2No vote 14 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
RenewFor 6Against 67Abst. 0No vote 5 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
EPPFor 2Against 165Abst. 2No vote 15 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 10Against 31Abst. 33No vote 10 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.17
PatriotsFor 13Against 23Abst. 39No vote 9 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.28
ESNFor 5Against 20Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.65
No groupFor 9Against 7Abst. 11No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium003
Bulgaria003
Cyprus001
Czechia031
Denmark001
Spain020
Finland100
France130
Greece002
Croatia001
Italy3200
Lithuania001
Latvia003
Netherlands111
Poland1113
Romania013
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 655 members

No vote recorded, 62

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 62 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
30 Apr 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 3 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European ParliamentAmendment73 for, 443 against, 63 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.66 525 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and materialAmendment85 for, 471 against, 93 abstained Rejected For 13 %r · shared0.61 589 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 39 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2026 – Section I – European ParliamentAmendment71 for, 463 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.61 527 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 61 to Article 3 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAmendment108 for, 480 against, 34 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.61 569 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 12 Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefireAmendment63 for, 351 against, 111 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.60 478 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 10 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment107 for, 488 against, 54 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.60 590 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 3 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European ParliamentAmendment162 for, 407 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.60 533 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital D The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, SudanAmendment188 for, 330 against, 84 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.60 554 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendment 2, adding text after recital E Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and materialAmendment182 for, 436 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 28 %r · shared0.59 588 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 58, adding text after recital 4 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAmendment117 for, 414 against, 101 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.59 579 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196402
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 25 — part 2, after paragraph 110 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196402, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196402 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196402,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 25 — part 2, after paragraph 110 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196402}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196402},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196402, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}