Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 25 — part 1, after paragraph 110

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Amendment 25 — part 1, after paragraph 110
Result
287 for · 366 against · 11 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:50
More facts (6)
Position
vote 103 of 139 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: The Left
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 110 – Am 25/1
Vote id
196401
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 287 for, 366 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 43 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Reiterates that Members of the European Parliament must act in accordance with the Code of Conduct for Members of the European Parliament regarding integrity and transparency;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 18Against 30Abst. 1No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.42
S&DFor 26Against 95Abst. 2No vote 12 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.66
RenewFor 6Against 67Abst. 1No vote 4 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
EPPFor 4Against 168Abst. 1No vote 11 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 77Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 73Against 0Abst. 2No vote 9 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
ESNFor 20Against 5Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.65
No groupFor 23Against 1Abst. 3No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium050
Bulgaria030
Germany090
Denmark040
Estonia020
Spain100
Finland030
France0120
Ireland310
Italy100
Lithuania020
Luxembourg001
Latvia010
Netherlands070
Poland010
Portugal020
Romania030
Sweden030
Slovenia110
Slovakia060

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 664 members

No vote recorded, 53

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 53 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 88, adding text after paragraph 21 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment230 for, 408 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 606 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 71 2025 Commission report on UkraineAmendment218 for, 421 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 605 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 26 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment254 for, 359 against, 44 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 609 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Jul 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal175 for, 360 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 32 %r · shared0.80 506 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 179 + 385 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment222 for, 415 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greens, The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.78 592 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 2025 Commission report on GeorgiaAmendment159 for, 396 against, 90 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 605 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 251 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment251 for, 354 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.78 598 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 4 The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAmendment235 for, 389 against, 40 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 606 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 186 + 387 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment223 for, 416 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greens, The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.76 592 voters
16 Dec 2025Amendment 18 to recital 2 Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsAmendment285 for, 367 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 605 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 25 — part 1, after paragraph 110 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196401, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196401 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196401,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 25 — part 1, after paragraph 110 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196401}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196401},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196401, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}