Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 7, after paragraph 101

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Amendment 7, after paragraph 101
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
201 for · 447 against · 15 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:50
More facts (5)
Position
vote 96 of 139 on the decision
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 101 – Am 7
Text
Report A-10-2026-0199
Dossier
2025/2069(INI)
Vote id
196395
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 201 for, 447 against, 15 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 26Abst. 12No vote 6 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.53
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 126Abst. 0No vote 9 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 75Abst. 0No vote 3 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 8Against 161Abst. 0No vote 15 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 73Against 3Abst. 0No vote 8 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 74Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 19Against 5Abst. 3No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0150
Denmark020
Spain040
Finland010
France050
Croatia010
Italy040
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 663 members

No vote recorded, 54

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 54 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
27 Nov 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 21 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment191 for, 380 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 537 voters
10 Jul 2025Amendment 1 to recital 2 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policiesAmendment191 for, 452 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 591 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 558 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 17 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment197 for, 421 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 574 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment186 for, 423 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 562 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment203 for, 417 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 586 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 91 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment207 for, 406 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 569 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment200 for, 411 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 573 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 65 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment194 for, 417 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.96 577 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 8 to paragraph 5 Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakesAmendment194 for, 408 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 567 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196395
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 7, after paragraph 101 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196395, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196395 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196395,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 7, after paragraph 101 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196395}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196395},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196395, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}