Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 94, after paragraph 88

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Amendment 94, after paragraph 88
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
117 for · 489 against · 65 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:48
More facts (6)
Position
vote 87 of 139 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 88 – Am 94
Text
Report A-10-2026-0199
Dossier
2025/2069(INI)
Vote id
196387
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 117 for, 489 against, 65 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 17 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 39Abst. 0No vote 4 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 1Against 50Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 0Against 125Abst. 0No vote 10 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 1Against 73Abst. 1No vote 3 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 17Against 159Abst. 0No vote 8 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
ECRFor 74Against 0Abst. 2No vote 8 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 13Against 36Abst. 25No vote 10 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.23
ESNFor 1Against 0Abst. 26No vote 0 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 9Against 7Abst. 11No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Bulgaria130
Cyprus020
Czechia320
Germany0300
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0220
Finland040
France140
Greece070
Croatia240
Hungary060
Ireland030
Italy720
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta020
Netherlands040
Poland0230
Portugal070
Romania080
Sweden140
Slovenia130
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 671 members

No vote recorded, 46

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 46 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Jun 2026Amendment 5 to citation 4 2025 Commission report on North MacedoniaAmendment145 for, 489 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.80 619 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 9 to paragraph 2 Enforcement of the Digital Markets ActAmendment136 for, 401 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.78 541 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 54 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAmendment132 for, 468 against, 45 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.77 639 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Amendment 10 to paragraph 88 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAmendment157 for, 458 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.77 648 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 18 to paragraph 14 Clean Industrial DealAmendment129 for, 386 against, 56 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.76 524 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 21 to paragraph 61 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment156 for, 502 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.76 611 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital B Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment195 for, 403 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.75 584 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 14 Recruitment of children by organised crimeAmendment181 for, 379 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.75 540 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 102 to paragraph 1 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment94 for, 533 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.75 620 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 11 to paragraph 6 Energy-intensive industriesAmendment112 for, 454 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.75 565 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196387
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 94, after paragraph 88 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196387, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196387 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196387,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 94, after paragraph 88 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196387}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196387},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196387, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}