Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 45 to paragraph 61

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Amendment 45 to paragraph 61
Result
178 for · 463 against · 12 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:45
More facts (5)
Position
vote 65 of 139 on the decision
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 61 – Am 45
Vote id
196371
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 178 for, 463 against, 12 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 27 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 32Abst. 5No vote 6 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 123Abst. 0No vote 12 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 73Abst. 0No vote 5 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 2Against 170Abst. 0No vote 12 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 73Against 0Abst. 2No vote 9 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 73Against 0Abst. 1No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 22Against 1Abst. 2No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
No groupFor 7Against 15Abst. 2No vote 4 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria030
Belgium030
Bulgaria050
Cyprus020
Czechia040
Germany0300
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0220
Finland040
France050
Greece070
Croatia060
Hungary060
Ireland030
Italy090
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta020
Netherlands040
Poland0220
Portugal070
Romania080
Sweden140
Slovenia120
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 653 members

No vote recorded, 64

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 64 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 108 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment195 for, 433 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.97 577 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 89 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment189 for, 438 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 573 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 7 Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroAmendment153 for, 424 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 550 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 88 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment195 for, 443 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 578 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 102 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment195 for, 439 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 577 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 96 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment189 for, 443 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 578 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 445 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 594 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 7 to recital AY The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment175 for, 378 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 508 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 98 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment199 for, 436 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 578 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 84 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment199 for, 431 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 574 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 45 to paragraph 61 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196371, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196371 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196371,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 45 to paragraph 61 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196371}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196371},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196371, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}