Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 44, after paragraph 56

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Amendment 44, after paragraph 56
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
148 for · 462 against · 59 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:45
More facts (5)
Position
vote 64 of 139 on the decision
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 56 – Am 44
Text
Report A-10-2026-0199
Dossier
2025/2069(INI)
Vote id
196370
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 148 for, 462 against, 59 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 22 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 39Abst. 0No vote 4 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 126Abst. 0No vote 9 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 1Against 74Abst. 0No vote 3 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 2Against 170Abst. 2No vote 10 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 44Against 1Abst. 32No vote 7 of 84Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
PatriotsFor 55Against 0Abst. 20No vote 9 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.60
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 18Against 1Abst. 5No vote 4 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0150
Denmark020
Spain040
Finland010
France050
Croatia010
Italy040
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 669 members

No vote recorded, 48

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 48 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 627 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.94 582 voters
21 May 2025Request by the PfE Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther132 for, 334 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 28 %r · shared0.94 441 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR GroupOther110 for, 309 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.94 397 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 22 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 580 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 37 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment176 for, 431 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 567 voters
27 Apr 2026Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group — Limiting EU legislation Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group – Limiting EU legislationOther127 for, 338 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.94 440 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 461 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 627 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 25 to recital P The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAmendment197 for, 455 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 611 voters
10 Jul 2025Amendment 1 to recital 2 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policiesAmendment191 for, 452 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 596 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196370
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 44, after paragraph 56 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196370, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196370 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196370,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 44, after paragraph 56 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196370}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196370},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196370, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}