Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 40, after paragraph 48

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Amendment 40, after paragraph 48
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
129 for · 465 against · 73 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:44
More facts (5)
Position
vote 56 of 139 on the decision
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 48 – Am 40
Text
Report A-10-2026-0199
Dossier
2025/2069(INI)
Vote id
196362
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 129 for, 465 against, 73 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 19 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 40Abst. 0No vote 4 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 50Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 123Abst. 0No vote 12 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 1Against 74Abst. 0No vote 3 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 1Against 172Abst. 2No vote 9 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 18Against 2Abst. 58No vote 6 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.62
PatriotsFor 64Against 0Abst. 10No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 19Against 4Abst. 3No vote 2 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0150
Denmark020
Spain040
Finland010
France050
Croatia010
Italy040
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 667 members

No vote recorded, 50

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 50 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital I EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment122 for, 454 against, 75 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 608 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 6 EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment110 for, 450 against, 84 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 602 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 32 to paragraph 12 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment133 for, 445 against, 75 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 606 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2026Amendment 18 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point g, point iii Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAmendment119 for, 436 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 20 %r · shared0.94 566 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital A EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment103 for, 461 against, 93 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 612 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 13 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAmendment119 for, 434 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 20 %r · shared0.94 564 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 31 to paragraph 11 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment130 for, 447 against, 75 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 607 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 11 to Article 2, after point 4 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAmendment120 for, 433 against, 52 abstained Rejected For 20 %r · shared0.94 565 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 11 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment175 for, 446 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 603 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 61, adding text after paragraph 52 2025 Commission report on UkraineAmendment143 for, 459 against, 59 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 618 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196362
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 40, after paragraph 48 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196362, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196362 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196362,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 40, after paragraph 48 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196362}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196362},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196362, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}