Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 92 to paragraph 48

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Amendment 92 to paragraph 48
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
217 for · 427 against · 19 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:43
More facts (6)
Position
vote 52 of 139 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 48 – Am 92
Text
Report A-10-2026-0199
Dossier
2025/2069(INI)
Vote id
196358
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 217 for, 427 against, 19 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 33 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 20Against 11Abst. 9No vote 4 of 44Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 125Abst. 0No vote 10 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 2Against 73Abst. 0No vote 3 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 6Against 166Abst. 1No vote 11 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 75Against 0Abst. 2No vote 7 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 69Against 2Abst. 2No vote 11 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
ESNFor 25Against 1Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 20Against 0Abst. 5No vote 3 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium120
Czechia501
Denmark100
Spain600
France2601
Greece100
Hungary1000
Italy400
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Poland200
Portugal100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 663 members

No vote recorded, 54

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 54 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 Banking Union – annual report 2024Amendment180 for, 346 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECR, ESNr · shared0.91 506 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 49 2025 Commission report on AlbaniaAmendment195 for, 429 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 603 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 26 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment189 for, 436 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 603 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 87 to Article 1 — part 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment206 for, 427 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 591 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 65 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment194 for, 417 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.89 578 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 50 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment198 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 649 voters
10 Jul 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal175 for, 360 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 32 %r · shared0.89 508 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 183 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment225 for, 387 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 586 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 6 to paragraph 27 Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single marketAmendment197 for, 402 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 566 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 84 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 10; Directive (UE) 2015/2302; Article 18, paragraph 2 Package travel and linked travel arrangements: make the protection of travellers more effective and simplify and clarify certain aspectsAmendment195 for, 411 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 572 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196358
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 92 to paragraph 48 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196358, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196358 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196358,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 92 to paragraph 48 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196358}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196358},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196358, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}