Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 19, after paragraph 42

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Amendment 19, after paragraph 42
Result
85 for · 538 against · 44 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:43
More facts (6)
Position
vote 49 of 139 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 42 – Am 19
Vote id
196355
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 85 for, 538 against, 44 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 13 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 2Against 48Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 17Against 105Abst. 2No vote 11 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.77
RenewFor 1Against 71Abst. 1No vote 5 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 0Against 176Abst. 0No vote 8 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 4Against 73Abst. 0No vote 7 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 2Against 36Abst. 36No vote 10 of 84Majority line TieClear line Divided Cohesion 0.23
ESNFor 1Against 21Abst. 4No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.71
No groupFor 18Against 8Abst. 1No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium130
Cyprus010
Germany0140
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0190
Finland020
France1300
Greece040
Croatia022
Hungary010
Ireland010
Italy0190
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Malta300
Netherlands040
Poland030
Portugal060
Romania070
Sweden050
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 667 members

No vote recorded, 50

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 50 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 16 Clean Industrial DealAmendment67 for, 480 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 516 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and materialAmendment85 for, 471 against, 93 abstained Rejected For 13 %r · shared0.75 598 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 93, adding text after Article 45 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)Amendment92 for, 496 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 588 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 54, adding text after recital 2 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAmendment104 for, 456 against, 67 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 581 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 16 Clean Industrial DealAmendment70 for, 476 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 509 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 14 to paragraph 16 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment67 for, 378 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 442 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 6 Clean Industrial DealAmendment106 for, 437 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 525 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 50 to paragraph 50 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment92 for, 536 against, 44 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 616 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 61 to Article 3 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAmendment108 for, 480 against, 34 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 575 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment71 for, 476 against, 84 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.71 582 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 19, after paragraph 42 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196355, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196355 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196355,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 19, after paragraph 42 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196355}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196355},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196355, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}