Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 30

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 30
Result
433 for · 137 against · 93 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:41
More facts (6)
Position
vote 39 of 139 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 30
Vote id
196345
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 433 for, 137 against, 93 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 5Against 19Abst. 14No vote 6 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 123Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 74Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 173Against 2Abst. 0No vote 9 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 4Against 39Abst. 35No vote 6 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
PatriotsFor 1Against 32Abst. 39No vote 12 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.31
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 2Against 19Abst. 5No vote 2 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium011
Cyprus001
Germany011
Denmark100
Spain030
Finland030
France007
Greece110
Ireland120
Italy072
Netherlands010
Portugal002
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 663 members

No vote recorded, 54

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 54 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 119 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment357 for, 206 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.88 520 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 121 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment358 for, 208 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 524 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 120 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment361 for, 209 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 527 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Final392 for, 219 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.87 578 voters
18 Jun 2026Paragraph 9 — part 2 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandSplit vote357 for, 144 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 516 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 123 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment376 for, 195 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 525 voters
8 Jul 2026Paragraph 29 — part 2 2025 Commission report on UkraineSplit vote426 for, 172 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.84 608 voters
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIFinal389 for, 191 against, 75 abstained Adopted For 59 %r · shared0.84 607 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 85 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote357 for, 200 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 528 voters
8 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Competition policy – annual report 2024Final358 for, 124 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.84 513 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 30 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196345, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196345 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196345,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 30 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196345}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196345},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196345, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}