Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 36, after paragraph 29

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Amendment 36, after paragraph 29
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
140 for · 493 against · 24 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:41
More facts (5)
Position
vote 37 of 139 on the decision
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 29 – Am 36
Text
Report A-10-2026-0199
Dossier
2025/2069(INI)
Vote id
196343
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 140 for, 493 against, 24 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 21 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 37Abst. 0No vote 6 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 122Abst. 0No vote 13 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 74Abst. 0No vote 4 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 2Against 172Abst. 0No vote 10 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 43Against 29Abst. 4No vote 8 of 84Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.35
PatriotsFor 61Against 0Abst. 11No vote 12 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
ESNFor 22Against 0Abst. 1No vote 4 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 11Against 8Abst. 8No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Cyprus100
Czechia020
Germany611
Spain100
France001
Greece130
Luxembourg100
Poland001
Romania100
Slovenia010
Slovakia015

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 657 members

No vote recorded, 60

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 60 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Nov 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 8 Draft amending budget No 3/2025: adjustment in payment appropriations, update of revenues and other technical updatesAmendment161 for, 463 against, 34 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 598 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 23 to paragraph 29 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2026 – Section I – European ParliamentAmendment142 for, 426 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 550 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 24 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment151 for, 405 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.89 534 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Sept 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 5 Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single marketAmendment155 for, 412 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 562 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 11 to Article 2, after point 4 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAmendment120 for, 433 against, 52 abstained Rejected For 20 %r · shared0.88 561 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital I EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment122 for, 454 against, 75 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.88 598 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 1, point i Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment151 for, 447 against, 50 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 596 voters
16 Dec 2025Amendment 3 to Article 15 Compulsory licensing of patents in crisis situationsAmendment128 for, 454 against, 57 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 581 voters
27 Apr 2026Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group — Limiting EU legislation Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group – Limiting EU legislationOther127 for, 338 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.87 437 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 401 to Article 6 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment131 for, 447 against, 72 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by Patriots, S&Dr · shared0.87 588 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196343
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 36, after paragraph 29 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196343, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196343 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196343,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 36, after paragraph 29 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196343}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196343},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196343, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}