Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 35, after paragraph 25

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Amendment 35, after paragraph 25
Result
188 for · 452 against · 16 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:40
More facts (5)
Position
vote 33 of 139 on the decision
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 25 – Am 35
Vote id
196338
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 188 for, 452 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 34Abst. 2No vote 7 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 122Abst. 0No vote 13 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 74Abst. 0No vote 4 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 4Against 165Abst. 0No vote 15 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 74Against 3Abst. 0No vote 7 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 63Against 0Abst. 12No vote 9 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.76
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 20Against 5Abst. 2No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Bulgaria040
Cyprus020
Czechia050
Germany0280
Denmark110
Estonia020
Spain0210
Finland040
France050
Greece070
Croatia060
Hungary060
Ireland030
Italy090
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta020
Netherlands040
Poland0190
Portugal070
Romania080
Sweden050
Slovenia220
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 656 members

No vote recorded, 61

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 61 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 50 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment198 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 642 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 11 to paragraph 26 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment170 for, 426 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 554 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 11 to paragraph 4 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment191 for, 443 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 589 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment182 for, 446 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 588 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 17 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment198 for, 417 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 564 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 616 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 24 to paragraph 14 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment161 for, 392 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 518 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 22 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 568 voters
27 Apr 2026Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group — Limiting EU legislation Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group – Limiting EU legislationOther127 for, 338 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.95 429 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 64, adding text after paragraph 40 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment203 for, 422 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 571 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 35, after paragraph 25 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196338, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196338 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196338,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 35, after paragraph 25 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196338}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196338},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196338, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}