Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 17

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 17
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
434 for · 235 against · 3 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:39
More facts (6)
Position
vote 26 of 139 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 17
Text
Report A-10-2026-0199
Dossier
2025/2069(INI)
Vote id
196333
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 434 for, 235 against, 3 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 6Against 32Abst. 1No vote 5 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.73
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 128Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 73Against 2Abst. 0No vote 3 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 172Against 2Abst. 1No vote 9 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 4Against 73Abst. 0No vote 7 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 0Against 75Abst. 0No vote 9 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 0Against 26Abst. 1No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Germany0140
France010
Hungary010
Italy010
Lithuania010
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 672 members

No vote recorded, 45

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 45 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 119 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment357 for, 206 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.93 528 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 120 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment361 for, 209 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 535 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Final392 for, 219 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.92 587 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 121 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment358 for, 208 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 532 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 85 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote357 for, 200 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 538 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 123 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment376 for, 195 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 533 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 116 to Article 7, paragraph 9 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment369 for, 199 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 535 voters
26 Nov 2025Paragraph 24 — part 1 Protection of minors onlineSplit vote418 for, 228 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.90 616 voters
8 May 2025Final vote Screening of foreign investments in the UnionFinal378 for, 173 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.90 534 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionFinal418 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.90 600 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196333
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 17 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196333, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196333 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196333,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 17 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196333}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196333},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196333, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}