Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 9 — part 1

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Paragraph 9 — part 1
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
425 for · 199 against · 45 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:37
More facts (6)
Position
vote 16 of 139 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN, Patriots · split vote: ESN
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 9/1
Text
Report A-10-2026-0199
Dossier
2025/2069(INI)
Vote id
196325
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 425 for, 199 against, 45 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 64 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘considers that the establishment of the Centre as a permanent structure by a legal act would represent a qualitative shift from fragmented coordination towards a more integrated, operational and strategic EU-level capacity;’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 4Against 2Abst. 32No vote 6 of 44Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.76
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 127Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 67Against 1Abst. 6No vote 4 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
EPPFor 172Against 2Abst. 0No vote 10 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 2Against 71Abst. 4No vote 7 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 1Against 74Abst. 0No vote 9 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 1Against 23Abst. 3No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0140
France010
Hungary010
Italy010
Lithuania010
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 669 members

No vote recorded, 48

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 48 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionFinal418 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.93 597 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 85 — part 3 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote424 for, 191 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.93 594 voters
8 May 2025Final vote Screening of foreign investments in the UnionFinal378 for, 173 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.93 529 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Banking Union – annual report 2025Final376 for, 187 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.93 539 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 119 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment357 for, 206 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.92 523 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.92 579 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 9 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote385 for, 178 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 530 voters
7 Jul 2026Separate vote on paragraph 3 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSeparate vote448 for, 188 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.92 609 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 531 voters
28 Apr 2026Extension of the term of office of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Final vote Extension of the term of office of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldOther422 for, 202 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.92 593 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196325
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 9 — part 1 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196325, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196325 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196325,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 9 — part 1 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196325}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196325},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196325, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}