Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 88, after paragraph 2

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Amendment 88, after paragraph 2
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
169 for · 471 against · 27 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:36
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 139 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 2 – Am 88
Text
Report A-10-2026-0199
Dossier
2025/2069(INI)
Vote id
196318
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 169 for, 471 against, 27 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 25 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 40Abst. 0No vote 4 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 1Against 49Abst. 1No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 0Against 127Abst. 0No vote 8 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 3Against 72Abst. 0No vote 3 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
EPPFor 11Against 162Abst. 2No vote 9 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 70Against 2Abst. 1No vote 11 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 58Against 0Abst. 17No vote 9 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.66
ESNFor 20Against 1Abst. 4No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.70
No groupFor 6Against 18Abst. 2No vote 2 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium300
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Czechia400
Denmark100
Spain200
Finland100
France400
Greece020
Croatia100
Italy2200
Lithuania200
Latvia300
Netherlands300
Poland1400
Romania401
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 667 members

No vote recorded, 50

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 50 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Jan 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Amendment148 for, 285 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 422 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 5 Case of Boualem Sansal in AlgeriaAmendment164 for, 435 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 568 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 154 to paragraph 28 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment185 for, 445 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 595 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 25 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027Amendment209 for, 447 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.90 655 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 8 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Amendment134 for, 283 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 408 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 23, adding text after recital 27 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanismAmendment172 for, 405 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 536 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 8 Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroAmendment145 for, 417 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 566 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 7 Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroAmendment153 for, 424 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 562 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 12 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranAmendment165 for, 386 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 532 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 14 Recruitment of children by organised crimeAmendment181 for, 379 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.89 538 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196318
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 88, after paragraph 2 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196318, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196318 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196318,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 88, after paragraph 2 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196318}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196318},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196318, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}