Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 27 to paragraph 1

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Amendment 27 to paragraph 1
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
135 for · 480 against · 56 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:35
More facts (6)
Position
vote 1 of 139 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 1 – Am 27
Text
Report A-10-2026-0199
Dossier
2025/2069(INI)
Vote id
196314
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 135 for, 480 against, 56 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 20 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 40Abst. 0No vote 4 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 126Abst. 0No vote 9 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 75Abst. 0No vote 3 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 174Abst. 0No vote 9 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 71Against 6Abst. 0No vote 7 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 23Against 1Abst. 50No vote 10 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.51
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 7Abst. 6No vote 2 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium003
Czechia006
Denmark010
Spain600
France0027
Greece100
Hungary0010
Italy500
Latvia001
Netherlands500
Poland002
Portugal001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 671 members

No vote recorded, 46

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 46 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 24 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment184 for, 441 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 584 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 50 to paragraph 117 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment198 for, 445 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 610 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 12 to paragraph 185 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment185 for, 426 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 583 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 10, adding text after recital D Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment187 for, 440 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 606 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment184 for, 441 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 600 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 37 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment176 for, 431 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 567 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 50 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment198 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 659 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 10 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningAmendment191 for, 455 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.92 608 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 11 to paragraph 26 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment170 for, 426 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 565 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 445 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 612 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196314
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 27 to paragraph 1 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196314, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196314 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196314,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 27 to paragraph 1 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196314}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196314},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196314, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}