Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 9, after paragraph 7

Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure

Vote
Amendment 9, after paragraph 7
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
196 for · 463 against · 8 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:33
More facts (6)
Position
vote 9 of 18 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0224/2026 – Andrzej Halicki – After § 7 – Am 9
Text
Report A-10-2026-0224
Dossier
2026/0144(BUD)
Vote id
196219
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 196 for, 463 against, 8 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 35Abst. 2No vote 5 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
GreensFor 0Against 50Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 2Against 126Abst. 0No vote 7 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 3Against 70Abst. 0No vote 5 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
EPPFor 0Against 175Abst. 0No vote 9 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 69Against 1Abst. 5No vote 9 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 75Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 19Against 6Abst. 1No vote 2 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria300
Czechia100
Germany1400
France100
Hungary100
Italy100
Lithuania100
Poland200
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 667 members

No vote recorded, 50

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 50 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 88, adding text after paragraph 179 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment207 for, 443 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 611 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 237 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment200 for, 440 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 602 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 19 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment200 for, 432 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 592 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 74 to paragraph 49, after point xii Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment200 for, 457 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.97 611 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 86 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment205 for, 441 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 605 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 50 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment198 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 653 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 94 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment202 for, 430 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 593 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 13 to paragraph 22 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment209 for, 433 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 599 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 149 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment203 for, 442 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 604 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment193 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 590 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196219
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 9, after paragraph 7 — Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196219, reference 2026/0144(BUD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196219 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196219,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 9, after paragraph 7 — Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196219}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196219},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196219, reference 2026/0144(BUD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}