Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 10, after paragraph 36

The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027

Vote
Amendment 10, after paragraph 36
Decision
No. 12 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
81 for · 532 against · 44 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 14:02
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 20 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0219/2026 – Sabrina Repp – After § 36 – Am 10
Text
Report A-10-2026-0219
Dossier
2025/2115(INI)
Vote id
196209
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 81 for, 532 against, 44 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 12 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 2Abst. 1No vote 4 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
GreensFor 3Against 42Abst. 2No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
S&DFor 24Against 96Abst. 4No vote 11 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.66
RenewFor 4Against 68Abst. 0No vote 6 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
EPPFor 1Against 168Abst. 3No vote 12 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 0Against 61Abst. 13No vote 10 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
PatriotsFor 0Against 69Abst. 6No vote 9 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 4No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
No groupFor 12Against 3Abst. 11No vote 2 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium220
Bulgaria110
Cyprus010
Germany0140
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain1180
Finland020
France0111
Greece040
Croatia111
Hungary100
Ireland010
Italy1621
Lithuania110
Luxembourg010
Malta120
Netherlands040
Poland030
Portugal070
Romania061
Sweden050
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 657 members

No vote recorded, 60

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 60 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
30 Apr 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in UkraineAmendment74 for, 489 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.70 528 voters
17 Jul 2024Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 9 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineAmendment96 for, 537 against, 44 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.70 605 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 37 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment103 for, 470 against, 83 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.69 602 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 Jan 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 14 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment81 for, 518 against, 56 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.67 594 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 14 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment78 for, 528 against, 58 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.67 602 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 89, adding text after paragraph 38 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment95 for, 523 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.67 596 voters
17 Jul 2024Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 8 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineAmendment113 for, 497 against, 58 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.66 599 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 19 to paragraph 38 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment78 for, 538 against, 38 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.66 600 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 12 Clean Industrial DealAmendment62 for, 497 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.66 516 voters
10 Jul 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsAmendment63 for, 552 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 10 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.65 570 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 7 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196209
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 10, after paragraph 36 — The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196209, reference 2025/2115(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196209 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196209,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 10, after paragraph 36 — The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196209}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196209},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196209, reference 2025/2115(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}