Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Monday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — ECB

Monday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – ECB

Vote
Monday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — ECB
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 14 Sept 2026
Result
154 for · 216 against · 85 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
14 September 2026, 18:21
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Monday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – ECB
Vote id
196475
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 154 for, 216 against, 85 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 34 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 29Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 9Against 0Abst. 73No vote 53 of 135Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.84
RenewFor 1Against 44Abst. 0No vote 33 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 0Against 126Abst. 0No vote 58 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 14Against 19Abst. 1No vote 50 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
PatriotsFor 38Against 15Abst. 8No vote 23 of 84Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.43
ESNFor 1Against 10Abst. 1No vote 15 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
No groupFor 16Against 2Abst. 2No vote 8 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Czechia100
Germany501
Spain100
France100
Greece300
Luxembourg010
Poland001
Slovenia010
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 455 members

No vote recorded, 262

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 262 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 Jul 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 46 Competition policy – annual report 2025Amendment139 for, 369 against, 144 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 417 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 78 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Amendment157 for, 374 against, 128 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 412 voters
14 Nov 2024Amendment 5 to recital G EU actions against the Russian shadow fleets and ensuring a full enforcement of sanctions against RussiaAmendment252 for, 318 against, 64 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 408 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Jan 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 7 Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the CongoAmendment162 for, 312 against, 137 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 393 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 178 to paragraph 79, after point l General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment249 for, 275 against, 127 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.77 415 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment112 for, 330 against, 124 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 375 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 Public procurementAmendment319 for, 295 against, 36 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 412 voters
13 Feb 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 11 Escalation of violence in the eastern Democratic Republic of the CongoAmendment142 for, 281 against, 108 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.77 335 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 1, adding text after recital D Escalating repression of the Baha’is in IranAmendment150 for, 388 against, 45 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 375 voters
11 Feb 2025Amendment 17, adding text before recital A European Central Bank – annual report 2024Amendment132 for, 337 against, 179 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 410 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-14/196475
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Monday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — ECB — Monday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – ECB”. Vote, 14 September 2026. votingId 196475. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-14/196475 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 14 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-14-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 14 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-14-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-14, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-14/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-14-196475,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Monday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — ECB — Monday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – ECB}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-14},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-14/196475}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-14/196475},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196475. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-14-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-14-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-14 (CC BY 4.0)}
}