Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 1 to recital E

Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre

Vote
Amendment 1 to recital E
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 9 Jul 2026
Result
176 for · 412 against · 3 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 July 2026, 13:42
More facts (6)
Position
vote 10 of 19 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
RC-B10-0345/2026/REV1 – Recital E – Am 1
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0356
Dossier
2026/2800(RSP)
Vote id
195745
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 176 for, 412 against, 3 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 36Abst. 0No vote 9 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 47Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 108Abst. 0No vote 27 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 1Against 64Abst. 0No vote 13 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 12Against 146Abst. 0No vote 26 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 65Against 1Abst. 0No vote 18 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 62Against 0Abst. 0No vote 23 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 10Abst. 3No vote 3 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Bulgaria010
Germany0130
Denmark030
Estonia020
Spain0190
Finland020
France080
Greece020
Croatia040
Hungary010
Ireland010
Italy0120
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Malta030
Netherlands040
Poland030
Portugal070
Romania060
Sweden050
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 591 members

No vote recorded, 128

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 128 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Amendment 9 to paragraph 19 Recruitment of children by organised crimeAmendment169 for, 389 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.97 485 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 7 to recital AY The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment175 for, 378 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 482 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 1, point c Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment189 for, 447 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 545 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 12 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment146 for, 316 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 411 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 6, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 426 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 505 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 9 to paragraph 116 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment188 for, 422 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 523 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 505 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 103 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment205 for, 419 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 525 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 415 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 500 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment192 for, 456 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 534 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 9 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195745
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 1 to recital E — Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre”. Vote, 9 July 2026. votingId 195745, reference 2026/2800(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195745 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-09-195745,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 1 to recital E — Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195745}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195745},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195745, reference 2026/2800(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}