Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 6 — part 2 to paragraph 7

Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre

Vote
Amendment 6 — part 2 to paragraph 7
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 9 Jul 2026
Result
148 for · 414 against · 35 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 July 2026, 13:41
More facts (6)
Position
vote 6 of 19 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: ECR
Official label
RC-B10-0345/2026/REV1 – § 7 – Am 6/2
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0356
Dossier
2026/2800(RSP)
Vote id
195740
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 148 for, 414 against, 35 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 25 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 0No vote 10 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 108Abst. 0No vote 27 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 68Abst. 0No vote 10 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 27Against 129Abst. 2No vote 26 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.72
ECRFor 54Against 12Abst. 1No vote 17 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.71
PatriotsFor 32Against 1Abst. 29No vote 23 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.27
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 10Against 12Abst. 3No vote 3 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium030
Bulgaria030
Germany090
Denmark040
Estonia020
Spain010
Finland030
France0110
Ireland060
Italy010
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Portugal020
Romania030
Sweden030
Slovenia020
Slovakia040

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 597 members

No vote recorded, 122

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 122 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 517 voters
16 Sept 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 64 Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureAmendment175 for, 438 against, 50 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 557 voters
16 Sept 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 64 Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureAmendment220 for, 432 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 554 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Amendment 1 to recital B Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenAmendment191 for, 342 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Patriots, S&Dr · shared0.86 470 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 21, adding text after recital D Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment213 for, 356 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 501 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 10 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.86 515 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 31 to paragraph 13 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment148 for, 382 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 482 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 11 to paragraph 9 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment204 for, 423 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 541 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment210 for, 396 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Patriots, EPPr · shared0.86 522 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 71 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment221 for, 402 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.85 540 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 9 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195740
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 6 — part 2 to paragraph 7 — Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre”. Vote, 9 July 2026. votingId 195740, reference 2026/2800(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195740 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-09-195740,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 6 — part 2 to paragraph 7 — Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195740}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195740},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195740, reference 2026/2800(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}