Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 15 to recital K

Joint communication on humanitarian aid

Vote
Amendment 15 to recital K
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 9 Jul 2026
Result
208 for · 347 against · 19 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 July 2026, 13:48
More facts (6)
Position
vote 14 of 15 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
B10-0339/2026 – Recital K – Am 15
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0339
Dossier
2026/2734(RSP)
Vote id
195616
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 208 for, 347 against, 19 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 36 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 36Abst. 0No vote 9 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 43Abst. 1No vote 9 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 1Against 102Abst. 3No vote 29 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 3Against 60Abst. 0No vote 15 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 41Against 99Abst. 10No vote 34 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
ECRFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 19 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 63Against 0Abst. 0No vote 22 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 7Abst. 5No vote 5 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Bulgaria020
Germany0130
Denmark030
Estonia020
Spain0190
Finland002
France080
Greece020
Croatia040
Ireland010
Italy0100
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Malta120
Netherlands040
Poland030
Portugal070
Romania051
Sweden050
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 574 members

No vote recorded, 145

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 145 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 51 to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment217 for, 416 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greens, Renewr · shared0.92 518 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 50 to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment220 for, 415 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greens, S&D, Renewr · shared0.92 518 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 64 to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment221 for, 413 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by ECR, Greens, S&D, Renewr · shared0.92 515 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 25 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesAmendment222 for, 429 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 33 %r · shared0.92 537 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 33 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment238 for, 400 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 522 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment204 for, 360 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.92 477 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 49 + 61 (voted as one) to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment221 for, 407 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ECR, Greens, S&D, Renewr · shared0.92 511 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 48 to recital 9 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment222 for, 418 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 518 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 8 to recital AJ Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesAmendment221 for, 426 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 33 %r · shared0.91 540 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 33 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesAmendment244 for, 410 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.91 539 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 5 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195616
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 15 to recital K — Joint communication on humanitarian aid”. Vote, 9 July 2026. votingId 195616, reference 2026/2734(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195616 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-09-195616,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 15 to recital K — Joint communication on humanitarian aid}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195616}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195616},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195616, reference 2026/2734(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}