Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 13 to recital D

Joint communication on humanitarian aid

Vote
Amendment 13 to recital D
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 9 Jul 2026
Result
238 for · 251 against · 88 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 July 2026, 13:48
More facts (6)
Position
vote 12 of 15 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
B10-0339/2026 – Recital D – Am 13
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0339
Dossier
2026/2734(RSP)
Vote id
195615
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 238 for, 251 against, 88 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 41 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 36Abst. 0No vote 9 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 2Against 103Abst. 0No vote 30 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 3Against 62Abst. 0No vote 13 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 68Against 0Abst. 83No vote 33 of 184Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.32
ECRFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 19 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 63Against 0Abst. 0No vote 22 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 6Abst. 5No vote 4 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Germany030
Denmark010
Spain040
Finland030
France090
Ireland010
Italy080
Netherlands010
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 577 members

No vote recorded, 142

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 142 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 146 to paragraph 125 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Amendment322 for, 305 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 508 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 64, adding text after paragraph 52 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment209 for, 287 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 404 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 36 to paragraph 22 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment208 for, 264 against, 94 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 473 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Dec 2025Monday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group (epizootic) Final vote Monday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group (epizootic)Other240 for, 194 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 55 %r · shared0.92 360 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 35 to paragraph 21 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment205 for, 262 against, 96 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by Greens, ECRr · shared0.91 474 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.91 493 voters
20 May 2026Amendments 27 + 39 (voted as one) to paragraph 1, after point ag Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment338 for, 285 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by ECR, Patriotsr · shared0.91 525 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 12 to paragraph 22 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment349 for, 287 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 515 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment280 for, 292 against, 26 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 499 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 7a Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment347 for, 277 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 506 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 5 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195615
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 13 to recital D — Joint communication on humanitarian aid”. Vote, 9 July 2026. votingId 195615, reference 2026/2734(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195615 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-09-195615,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 13 to recital D — Joint communication on humanitarian aid}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195615}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195615},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195615, reference 2026/2734(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}